Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1961 (6) TMI 11

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... orm No. 11 of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, wherein it was stated that the assessee "is liable to pay tax on sales made from the 1st October, 1955". Later on it was discovered on inspection by Sri. S. Chandra, Inspector of Sales Tax, that the assessee has been carrying on business at least from the year 1948. The Inspector reported that the proprietor of the business was Ashwani Kumar Sarkar, who was also the proprietor of Saudamani Stores. On the 22nd July, 1956, the Superintendent of Sales Tax initiated a proceeding under section 13(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act for assessment of sales tax against the assessee for the period from the 2nd July, 1952, to the 30th September, 1955. The assessment was made by the Superintendent of Sales Tax to th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... valid for want of sanction of the Commissioner as required under rule 39, sub-rule (3), of the Sales Tax Rules, 1949?" On behalf of the State of Bihar the learned Government Advocate put forward the argument that the Board of Revenue was erroneous in holding that the order of assessment made under section 13(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act by the Superintendent of Sales Tax on the 28th September, 1956, was tantamount to an order of review within the meaning of section 24(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, and that previous sanction of the Commissioner was necessary under rule 39(3) of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, which reads as follows: "39. Review (3) No officer below the rank of Commissioner shall review any order which has been passed by any o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate and reads as follows: "Form II Certificate of Registration under section 9/10 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947. [See sub-rule (1) of rule 5.] Regn. No.................. ..................Circle This is to certify that the dealer, whose particulars are detailed below, has been registered under section 9/10 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, on the..................of..................19. He is liable to pay tax on sales made from the.................. 1.. Name of the dealer 2. Status (Write here individual, Hindu undivided family, firm, limited company, association of persons, etc., as the case may be) 3.. Style under which the business is conducted 4. Nature of business 5. Location of the place of business (a) Mahalla/Road (b) V .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a finding of the Superintendent of Sales Tax that the assessee was liable to pay sales tax only from the 1st October, 1955, there is no finality in law with regard to that finding, and such a finding, even if it is assumed to have been made, is beyond the scope of the authority of the Superintendent of Sales Tax acting under the provisions of section 9 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act or under the rules made by the State Government in that behalf. It is manifest that in this case we are concerned with the question of assessment of sales tax for a period for which the assessee has failed to apply for registration, and a matter of this description is directly covered by the statutory provisions of section 13(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, which is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Commissioner is necessary for such proceedings under rule 39(3) of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules. For these reasons we hold that the order of assessment dated the 28th September, 1956, made by the Superintendent of Sales Tax, Patna, does not amount to an order of review within the meaning of section 24(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, and no sanction of the Commissioner is necessary to the initiation of such proceedings under rule 39, subrule (3), of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules. We accordingly answer the question of law referred to the High Court by the Board of Revenue in favour of the State of Bihar and against the assessee. The assessee must pay the costs of this reference. Hearing fee Rs. 250. References answered accordingly.
Case laws, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates