TMI Blog2009 (10) TMI 675X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e appellant, it is submitted that there is a mistake apparent from the record in Final Order No. A/376/2009/SMB/C-IV dated 6-7-2009 [2009 (16) S.T.R. 20 (Tri.-Mumbai)] which was passed by this Bench in the captioned appeal. In this application, the appellant seeks to re-agitate the issue already dealt with and decided upon in the above final order. In this connection, the appellant also cites case ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rist taxi service, no evidence was adduced by the appellant to substantiate their claim that these services were used in or in relation to the manufacture/clearance of excisable goods. The appellant has found fault with this finding as well. The only remedy, it appears, for the appellant if aggrieved, is a statutory appeal against the Tribunal s order, as rightly pointed out by the SDR. 2. The p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
