Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1982 (4) TMI 268

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l Shukla, another son of Laxmi Narain Shukla, filed a suit, being suit No. 61 of 1963, in the court of the Ist Civil Judge, Kanpur, against these petitioners. He impleaded his sons Rajendra Prasad Shukla and Surendra Kunwar Shukla as pro forma defendants. His case was that the aforesaid business was being carried on by a partnership consisting of himself, the three petitioners and his two sons and that he was entitled to have the charge and management of the business. He, therefore, prayed for a decree for permanent mandatory injunction directing defendants 1 to 3 to the suit, that is, the petitioners, to deliver charge and management of the business to him as also to render the accounts. There was a prayer for appointment of receiver also. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ax and sales tax liabilities. It has also been alleged that the position of the receiver was that of a "dealer" under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, and, therefore, it was he who was responsible to discharge the sales tax liabilities. The tax authorities in collusion with the receiver did not proceed against him to realise the outstanding dues but proceeded against the petitioners which action was wholly illegal and uncalled for. The petitioners hence pray for the issue of a writ, order or direction restraining the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 from enforcing the liability in respect of sales tax for the aforesaid period against the petitioners and for proceeding to realise the same from respondent No. 3. Counter-affidavits have been filed on behalf .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... business of buying or selling goods in Uttar Pradesh whether for commission, remuneration or otherwise and includes any firm or Hindu joint family and any society, club or association, which sells goods to its members and also includes any department of the State Government or the Central Government which carries on such business; and any undertaking engaged in the generation or distribution of electrical energy or any other form of power. Explanation.-A factor, a broker, a commission agent or arhati, a del credere agent, an auctioneer, or any other mercantile agent by whatever name called, and whether of the same description as hereinbefore mentioned or not, who carries on the business of buying or selling goods on behalf of his principa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates