Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1985 (8) TMI 337

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s may be the reason for the Revenue to initiate proceedings for recovery of the aforesaid dues from the second petitioner. Accordingly the first respondent served on the second petitioner a notice under section 65 of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968, for short, the Recovery Act, calling upon him to show cause why a warrant of arrest shall not be issued against him since the company has failed to remit the said dues. The second petitioner by his reply dated 29th June, 1985 has given the explanation thus: "I am in receipt of your letter No. R8 20586/84 dated the 19th June, 1985. The amounts mentioned in your letter are due and payable by Punalur Paper Mills Ltd. on account of sales tax, provident fund, ESI, etc. For liability of a Publ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6.. Exhibit P3 is under challenge in this original petition. 7.. Before I go into the merits of the case, I shall state the law, applicable to the case. Under the Sales Tax Act, a registered dealer whose total turnover for the year is not less than the amount specified in section 5 of the Act, is bound to pay tax on the said taxable turnover for that year. The tax, a dealer is liable to pay, is determined in terms of section 16 of the Act. The tax thus assessed shall be paid by the assessee, that is the dealer, within the time specified in the notice of demand, the Revenue would serve on him in form No. 14B prescribed under rules 20 and 21. If the assessee commits default in paying the tax in terms of the demand notice, the assessee wil .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ibit P3 order. 8.. The question thus arising for consideration is whether the second petitioner can be treated as a defaulter within the meaning of the Sales Tax Act. To be a defaulter under the Sales Tax Act, a dealer who has been assessed to tax, should have failed to pay the said tax within the time stipulated in the notice of demand. In other words, until an assessee (dealer) is declared a defaulter, recovery proceedings cannot be initiated against the said person. 9.. It is not the case of the respondents that the Sales Tax Act by any provision therein has fastened any liability on a Director or the Managing Director of a company to pay the tax, due by the company. For that matter, there is no provision in the Sales Tax Act making .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... add to the said rights and liabilities by referring to other laws (vide Ravulu Subba Rao v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras AIR 1956 SC 604). Unless provisions of other laws are expressly or by necessary implication incorporated in a codifying and amending Act such provisions have no relevance to decide questions directly falling under the codifying statute. Jullundur Vegetables Syndicate case [1966] 17 STC 326 (SC); AIR 1966 SC 1295 supports this view. It therefore follows that in the absence of a specific provision in the Sales Tax Act fastening liability on the Director or the Managing Director of a company for the tax due by the company, I am of the view, that no proceedings can be initiated against the Director or the Managing Direc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oner-company. Exhibit P3 proceedings of the District Collector therefore is one passed without jurisdiction and hence void ab initio. It is non est. 13.. The learned Advocate-General, however, submits that the second petitioner, inasmuch as he has been imprisoned in civil prison, cannot be set free even if this Court is to quash the order pursuant to which, he has been directed to be kept in civil prison. In support of this argument, he referred to the provisions contained in sub-section (5) of section 4 of the Kerala High Court Act. The said section provides that an application for the exercise of the powers conferred by section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 or by clause (1) of article 226 of the Constitution of India where .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates