Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2011 (1) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... contributed the additional capital by account payee cheques only which are duly reflected in the copy of bank account by the appellant - Hence, the view taken by the CIT(A) as upheld by the Tribunal cannot be held to be erroneous -The appeals have to be dismissed. - 741 OF 2010 - - - Dated:- 5-1-2011 - ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, JJ. Tejinder K. Joshi for the Appellant. ORDER Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. This order shall dispose of ITA Nos. 741, 742 and 743 of 2008 as it is stated that all the appeals involve common questions. 2. Income-Tax Appeal No. 741 of 2010 has been preferred by the revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against order dated 18-3-2010 pas .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... spare parts and unexplained deposits in the partner's account. On appeal, the said addition was partly set aside by the CIT(A) on the basis of additional evidence furnished by the assessee. The said finding has been upheld by the Tribunal. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant fairly stated that if additional evidence was validly allowed to be led, the setting aside of addition was justified. The only objection is that additional evidence should not have been allowed. 6. Reasons for allowing additional evidence given by the CIT(A) are as under : "2.5 I have gone through the assessment record, written submissions filed by the counsel for the assessee evidence tendered along with the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the case the sickness of the partner is valid reason for not producing the evidence during the assessment. The fact that the matter was taken up in the fag end of the limitation period is also relevant. Considering the totality of the circumstances, I admit the additional evidence filed by the appellant. Now considering the material on record the source of Rs. 14 lakhs stands duly explained by the sale deed of the agricultural land by the partner of the assessee firm who has received the sale price and contributed the additional capital by account payee cheques only which are duly reflected in the copy of bank account by the appellant. The only objection on merits by the Assessing Officer is that the date of introduction of fresh capit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates