Professional misconduct by CA - The NFRA concluded that the ...

Audit Firm and Partner Fined, Banned for Professional Misconduct in Investigation Non-Cooperation and False Statements.

May 7, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law NFRA

Professional misconduct by CA - The NFRA concluded that the actions of the firm and the engagement partner constituted professional misconduct. They failed to cooperate with the NFRA's investigation by not providing the requested information and by submitting false statements. The authority imposed a monetary penalty of fifty lakhs INR on the audit firm and thirty lakhs INR on the engagement partner. Furthermore, they were barred from being appointed as auditors or undertaking any audits related to financial statements or internal audit functions of any company or body corporate for two and ten years, respectively.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Professional misconduct by CA - The NFRA concluded that the ...

Audit Firm and Partner Fined, Banned for Professional Misconduct in Investigation Non-Cooperation and False Statements.

May 7, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law NFRA

You may also like:

Professional misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement partner with audit firm - Acceptance of the Audit Engagement - The NFRA concluded that the audit firm and the...

Professional Misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement Partner (EP) with Audit Firm - The NFRA refuted the firm’s claims that only the EP was accountable,...

Alleged professional misconduct by auditors involving diversion of funds, understatement of diverted funds, evergreening of loans through fund circulation, fraudulent...

Professional Misconduct - Acceptance of audit engagement disregarding Independence requirements - Tampering of Audit File and related lapses-SA 230, Audit Documentation...

Professional Misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement Partner (EP) with Audit Firm - The NFRA found that the auditors did not adequately report the non-recognition...

Professional Misconduct - Chartered Accountant (CA) - Significant failures to adhere to Standards on Auditing (SAs), gross negligence, and lack of professional...

The NFRA held the Engagement Partner (EP) and Engagement Quality Control Reviewer (EQCR) guilty of professional misconduct u/ss 132(4), 22 of the Companies Act 2013 and...

The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) held that the statutory auditors of Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (CDEL) committed professional misconduct u/s 132(4)...

Appointment of Auditor for Forensic Audit - One partner of the firm, Haribhakti & Co. appointed to conduct audit in his individual capacity - Locus of the another...

Taxability in the hands of partners v/s firm - transfer of capital asset by firm to partners - There is no merit in the arguments advanced by assessee, that transfer of...

Professional Misconduct - Chartered Accountant (CA) - Lapses in evaluation of writing-back of liabilities - Failure in evaluation and attendance at physical verification...

In a case under Section 138 of the N.I. Act against partners of a firm, the HC held that compounding of the offense by one partner discharges the entire liability of the...

Jurisdiction - Constitutional Validity of Rule 9(3)(b) of the Chartered Accountants’ (Procedure of Investigation of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of...

Section 125(1) of SVLDR Scheme disqualifies persons subjected to enquiry/investigation where duty involved was not quantified by 30.06.2019. Section 121(m) defines...

The NFRA held that the Auditors were grossly negligent and failed to exercise due diligence in the audit of a public interest entity, amounting to professional...

Quick Updates: