2012 (1) TMI 79

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order dated 8.7.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition (CWP No.19783 of 2010) filed by respondent No.1 for directing the appellant to reimburse the medical expenses incurred by him in getting his treatment from Fortis Hospital, Mohali, has been allowed.   Though this appeal is barred by limitation, and along with .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e learned Single Judge while following the decision of the Delhi High Court, where a similar controversy arose, has allowed the writ petition and directed the appellant to pay the medical reimbursement to respondent No.1 as per his entitlement under the CGHS. These judgments of Delhi High Court have been noticed in the latest Single Bench decision of Delhi High Court in Kishan Chand Versus Govt. o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... approved list P.N. Chopra V. UOI, (iii) 2004 DLT 190.   5) Status of retired employee not as card holder: S.K. Sharma V. UOI : 2002 (64) DRJ 620;   6) If medical treatment is availed, whether the employee is a cardholder or not is irrelevant and full reimbursement to be given. B.R. Mehta V. UOI: 79(1999) DLT 388."   The learned counsel for the appellant is not able to controvert .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X