TMI Blog2011 (9) TMI 456X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urisdiction. - E/1616/2010 - - - Dated:- 29-9-2011 - Shri Ashok Jindal, Shri P.R. Chandrasekharan, JJ. Appearance: Shri Bharat Raichandani, Advocate for the appellant Shri Y.K. Agarwal, Authorised Representative (SDR) for the respondent Per: Ashok Jindal: The appellant are in appeal along with stay application against the impugned order denying input credit on service tax av ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat the issue involved is of narrow compass. Therefore, we are disposing of the appeal also along with the stay application. 4. The learned advocate for the appellant submits that the appellant has complied with all the requirements of Rule 4A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and all the requirements are mentioned in the letter. Therefore, service tax credit cannot be denied. He also produced t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... whole documents before the lower authorities. Therefore, they could not give any finding on those documents and whatever documents have filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) he has given finding on it. 6. Heard both sides. 7. We have considered the submissions and find that the CENVAT credit of input service is denied only on the ground that the letter does not have all the details prescri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
