9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (6) TMI 416X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s to condone the delay of 985 days in filing the present appeals. 2. Elaborating on his arguments Shri R.L. Thapali, learned Advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the impugned order was passed by the Commissioner of Customs ICD Delhi on 31.3.08 confirming demand of duty against M/s Sheel Chand Industries which is a partnership firm of the present applicants. Vide said order, h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e appeal was filed on behalf of all the three appellants. 2. Learned Advocate further claries that the Joint appeal was filed by the Advocate handling the matter at the relevant time, However, when the appellant approached the present Advocate, he was advised by the Counsel to file two separate appeals as per the procedure of the CESTAT. and that is how the present separate appeals filed b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed well within the period of limitation was on account of all the three applicants. 5. In as much as the main appeal was filed well within the limitation period of 3 months, the present two appeals filed by the partners are required to be treated as supplementary appeals and the delay in filing the same is required to be condoned. We order accordingly and allow the COD applications. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e order impugned in the present appeal was also impugned in the main appeal of M/s Sheel Chand industries and stand set aside, we by following the earlier order, set aside the impugned order in respect of the present appellants also and allow their appeals. Stay petition also gets disposed of. 9. COD application, stay applications and appeals get disposed of in the above manner. Or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
