2012 (7) TMI 320

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion is for recalling of final order No.230/11, dtd. 27.05.11 vide which after allowing the COD application, stay petition and appeal was dismissed.   2. It is seen that nobody appeared before Tribunal on the said date. As per the appellants, they did not receive the notice of hearing and as such the appearance could not be caused. It is also their contention that it was only COD and after th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eimbursement expenses. The appellant s contention is that the period involved if 01.04.2000 to 31.03.2007 and the show cause notice stands issued on 27.10.07. During the relevant period, there was conflicting orders of the Tribunal on the said issue and there was utter confusion. As such invocation of longer period was not justified. However, ld. Advocate fairly agrees that a part of the period in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X