TMI Blog2010 (2) TMI 952X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der]. - RTI application filed on : 9-9-2009 PIO replied : Not replied First appeal filed on : Not appealed Complaint filed on : 5-11-2009 Complaint notice sent on : 9-11-2009 Hearing notice sent on : 13-1-2010 Hearing held on : 16-2-2010 2. Information Sought : (a) Certified copy of the selection process and educational qualification of candidates of spoken English who were selected on contract basis in 2009. (b) Certified copy of the educational qualification of candidates who came for the interview of English (Spoken) in year 2009-10. (c) Name and base on which memb ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the School understands the term spoken English and is able to understand what information the Complainant is seeking. He has also given to the Commission another letter of Mr. K. P. Patade dated 25-11-2009 in which he again appears to be claiming that he is incapable of understanding what the term Spoken English means. 8. Decision dated 16-2-2010 : The Complaint was allowed. The PIO was directed to give the complete information to the Appellant before 28 February 2010. The issue before the Commission was of not supplying the complete, required information by the PIO Mr. K.P. Patade within 30 days as required by the law. A showcause notice was being issued to him, and he was directed to present himself before the Commission at the above ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llant has used a term candidates for spoken English instead of the term candidates of spoken English Teacher. The Appellant s RTI application which was written in Hindi was fairly clear and even the primary teacher of the school who was representing the PIO, - who is the Principal of the school,- was able to understand what the appellant wanted. The PIO s claim that he could not understand that the RTI application was sent by the Appellant since it was mooted through the Post Office is also very difficult to believe. The RTI Application has been sent by speed post by the Appellant with Rs. 10/- PIO attached with it. The PIO has submitted a written submission in which he states that In connection with the subject sited above I have to say w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has been over 100 days, the Commission is passing an order penalizing Mr. K.P. Patade for Rs. 25000/- which is the maximum penalty under the Act. The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, is directed to recover the amount of Rs. 25000/- from the salary of Mr. K.P. Patade, Principal PIO and remit the same by a demand draft or a Banker s Cheque in the name of the Pay Accounts Officer, CAT, payable at New Delhi and send the same to Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar, Joint Registrar and Deputy Secretary of the Central Information Commission, 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, New Delhi - 110066. The amount may be deducted at the rate of Rs. 5000/- per month every month from the salary of Mr. K.P. Patade and remitted by the 10th of every mo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
