Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

TP Adjustment - comparable selection - The Tribunal upheld the ...


Tribunal Rules on Comparable Companies for Benchmarking; Includes HSIL, Excludes Cera for Insufficient Revenue Data.

May 13, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

TP Adjustment - comparable selection - The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of HSIL Limited in the list of comparables, considering its core business activities in manufacturing and selling sanitaryware products. Despite some functional diversity, the Tribunal found the core activities sufficiently similar for comparison purposes. - The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Cera Sanitaryware Limited from the list of comparables. It noted that while the functions performed by Cera Sanitaryware Limited were similar to the Assessee's, the lack of proportionate revenue data for different activities made it unreliable for benchmarking purposes.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding software development services benchmarking. The Tribunal comprehensively examined functional comparability, rejecting...

  2. ITAT directs selective inclusion and exclusion of comparables across multiple service segments. Key determinations include excluding Innovana Thinklabs Ltd. and K7...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal ruled on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, excluding companies with high turnover from comparables. Companies like Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd., Tata...

  4. TP adjsutment - “AE” investment banking activities - comparable selection - The persistence loss- making company are normally excluded as comparable. As per the...

  5. ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding comparable company selection. The tribunal determined the Arm's Length Price (ALP) computation by the Transfer...

  6. ITAT ruled on several transfer pricing adjustments in the comparable selection process. The Tribunal excluded Cosmic Global for failing the 75% export sales filter and...

  7. TP Adjustment - benchmarking the international transactions u/s 92CA(1) - Safe Harbour Rules - At the outset, we find that Safe Harbour Rules are applicable from...

  8. Arm's Length Price adjustment on international transaction – selection of comparable - if abnormal loss making companies are excluded abnormal profit making companies...

  9. HELD: DRP excluded forex losses and gains from operating income computation based on safe harbor rules. However, both being of similar nature, forex gains to be treated...

  10. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

  11. MCA amended Rule 9B of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 through notification dated Feb 12, 2025. The amendment extends compliance deadline...

  12. Comparable selection - Tribunal remanded issue of inclusion of companies to TPO to examine functional comparability after applying applicable filters. If functionally...

  13. The Tribunal held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)/Assessing Officer (AO) should exclude companies having turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores from the comparability...

  14. Matters to be included in Board's Report for One Person Company and Small Company - Rule 8A of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014

  15. Comparable selection for determining arm's length price (ALP) adjustment. Appeals limited to including or excluding certain uncontrolled entities as comparables...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates