2012 (9) TMI 386

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... redemption fine could be imposed only in respect of goods seized but not held liable for confiscation. - C.S.T.A. No. 16 of 2008 - - - Dated:- 28-7-2011 - N. Kumar and Ravi Malimath, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri Y. Hariprasad, Advocate, for the Appellant. [Judgment per : N. Kumar, J.]. The Revenue has preferred this appeal against the order of the appellate Tribunal [2008 (226) E.L.T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n find could be imposed in respect of tiles, which not at all seized, but held liable for confiscation. Therefore the order imposing redemption fine of Rs. 24,00,000.00 was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for imposing redemption fine only in respect of 11094.60 sq. mtrs. Aggrieved by the said order, the Revenue has preferred this appeal. 3. We have heard the learn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X