9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (2) TMI 331X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ad directed the appellant to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 14,00,000/- within six weeks and report compliance to the Assistant Registrar on 27.8.2012 vide Stay Order No. 1074/2012 dated 26.6.2012. The Assistant Registrar reported that there was no compliance. The appellant, in miscellaneous application No. 506/2012, requested for extension of time. Though there was nobody to move that application d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd, more significant, refers to an order passed by the Hon ble High Court, which is order dated 11.9.2012 passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No. 28295 of 2012 filed against Stay Order No. 1074/2012 dated 26.6.12 passed by this Bench. On a perusal of the Hon ble High Court s order, we find that Hon ble High Court did not interfere with our direction for pre-deposit of Rs. 14 l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /- is paid herewith vide Challan No. 00025 thus totaling 50% of the pre-deposit actually required to be paid. The disputed period is only for the year 2004-05 and not from 1/4/2005 to 16/6/2005 in which period the benefit of said notification is available to the Appellant. The above averments of the appellant amount to a plea for modification of our original stay order which has already me ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
