9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (3) TMI 359X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the revisionist by assessing authority for the month of April, 2010 (A.Y.2010-11). Aggrieved by the said order, the revisionist filed first appeal along with an application for stay. By order dated 23.2.2013 (Annexure No.5), the appellate authority granted interim stay of 60% of the tax during the pendency of the appeal rest is to be deposited by assessee in pursuance of the assessment/penalty order. Aggrieved by the aforesaid first appellate order, the revisionist filed Second Appeal No.75/2013 for the month of April, 2010 (Assessment Year 2010-11). By order dated 5.3.2013, learned Commercial Tax Tribunal, Bench-I, Lucknow granted the interim stay only to the extent of 80% tax directing the appellant to deposit 20% tax/penalty during th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... are not the considerations for deciding the application. The order of the Appellate Authority itself must show that it had applied its mind to the issue raised by the appellant and it has been considered in accordance with law. The expression "undue hardship" has a wider connotation as it takes within its ambit the case where the assessee is asked to deposit the amount even if he is likely to exonerate from the total liability on disposal of his appeal. Dispensation of deposit should also be allowed where two views are possible. While considering the application for interim relief, the Court must examine all pros and cons involved in the case and further examine that in case recovery is not stayed, the right of appeal conferred by the legis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... see to pay full or even substantive part of the demand and the stay application should not be disposed of in a routine manner unmindful of the consequences. Keeping in view the settled position of law on the point in issue and from the perusal of the appellate order passed by the appellate authority/appellate tribunal thereby passing the impugned orders, the said authorities have not indicated its mind so far as the existence of the prima facie case on merits on appeal as well as the financial condition which are to be considered by them (appellate authority/tribunal) while passing the impugned orders on an application for stay pending in the first appeal. The said mandatory condition is to be taken into consideration while disposing of an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
