9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (5) TMI 207X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ore this Court raising a grievance in respect of the callous inaction on the part of the first respondent in not effecting the refund of entry tax remitted by the petitioner, despite the order passed by the appellate authority vide Ext.P4. 2. The case of the petitioner is that, the petitioner is running a hospital in Ernakulam and in the course of steps for increasing the amenities in the hospita ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e of the pendency of the appeal, the respondents proceeded with steps under the R.R. Act by issuing Ext.P1 notice which made the petitioner to approach this Court by filing W.P. (C).No. 18971/2004, wherein an interim order was passed on 28.6.2004 granting interim stay on condition that the petitioner satisfed a sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand); which is stated as complied with, as borne b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for similar benefit. 4. No counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents so far. 5. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the verdict passed by this Court in Thressiamma L. Chirayil V. State of Kerala (2007 (1) KLT 303), has been subjected to challenge by filing an appeal before the Supreme Court, which stands admitted and that the matter has not become ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
