9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (5) TMI 480X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pondents. The petitioner has sought following reliefs :- "1. To quash the notice dated 11.07.2012 (P/6) issued by the respondent no.1 u/s 52(2) initiating penalty proceeding for the year 2008-09. 2. To direct the respondent no.1, the assessing officer to hear & decide stay application of the petitioner at an earlier date. 3. To direct the respondent no.4, the Appellate Board to hear & decide s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the petitioner to Division Bench judgments of this Court in W.P.No.8252/2012 M/s Vijay Tank & Vessels Private Limited Vs. The Divisional Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Sagar & others dated 28.5.2012, S.R.Kalani & Co. Vs. C.L.Sharma & another [(2004) 3 STJ 282 (MP)] and a Single Bench judgment of this Court in Haji Abdul Hussain T.Malu Bhai Vs. Assistant Commercial Tax Officer & others ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l validity but may direct the appeal pending before the respondent no.2 challenging the original order of assessment to be disposed of and till then not to take any proceeding as regards the penalty, inasmuch as, in case of ultimate success in the original appeal, there would be no proceeding for imposition of penalty. Regard being had to the aforesaid aspect and having heard learned counsel for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
