TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 23X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is Court in Rajkumar Shivhare v. Union of India [2011 (7) TMI 861 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] - The period for filing a revision under Section 35EE(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was three months - However, the Central Government, if the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the application within three months may allow the application to be presented within a further period of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndent. ORDER P.C. : Rule; with the consent of Counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the Counsel and at their request, the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2. The first respondent filed a rebate claim which was rejected by the Adjudicating Authority on 29 January, 2008. The order of the Adjudicating Authority was challenged before the Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... would be attracted in view of the judgment of this Court in Rajkumar Shivhare v. Union of India - 2011 (273) E.L.T. 75 (Bom.). The period for filing a revision under Section 35EE(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is three months. However, the Central Government, if the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the application within three months may allow the application to be p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
