2013 (10) TMI 444

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uty under Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and no penalty can be imposed under Rule 25 - the appellant has made out a prima facie case for the waiver of pre-deposit of amount of penalty till the disposal of appeal – stay granted. - Appeal No. : E/11747 of 2013 - - - Dated:- 3-9-2013 - Mr. H.K. Thakur, J. For the Appellant: Shri D.K. Trivedi, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ok Kumar Manibhai Patel Company vs. CCE, Bhopal [2011 (263) ELT 279 (Tri. Del.)] 3. Shri Manoj Kutty (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that as per the following case laws penalty upon the defaulter under Rule 8 (3A) is imposable under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002:- (a) Pee Dee Polymers vs. CCE, Ahmd. [2012 (278) ELT 647 (Tri. Ahmd.) (b) Weldon Cello Plast Limite .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X