2014 (1) TMI 272

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sit of duty of Rs.38,16,736/- + Rs.70,014/- + Rs.1,49,727/- and penalty of Rs.5,00,000/- imposed under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. None present for the applicant despite notice of hearing having been sent to them well in advance. The applicant has sought adjournment on the ground that the hearing before the Commissioner (A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has been denied, were listed by the ld. Commissioner in the impugned order and after detailed discussions on the discrepancies in the relevant documents and eligibility of modvat credit on the capital goods, the reasons had been duly recorded by the ld. Commissioner in the impugned order. In other words, this is a case for appreciation of documents/evidences relating to input invoices and its elig .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it of Rs.38,16,736/- + Rs.70,014/- + Rs.1,49,727/-within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order and report compliance on 19.06.2013. Failure to deposit the said amount would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. On deposit of the said amount, the balance amount of dues adjudged would stand waived and its recovery stayed during pendency of the appea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X