TMI Blognegative list based regimeX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... negative list based regime X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... relevance/applicability of this case in the negative list based regime of service tax? my doubt is whether the service is taxable or not as per the present service tax provisions? Please justify your answer. Thanks and regards, Reply By Rajesh Nathoo: The Reply: Dear Dalia , It is taxable under Negative List Regime as it is nowhere mentioned in Negative List . Reply By Viswanathan Nemmara: Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Reply: Of late the Service Tax authorities have been raising demand stating that the goods transport done within the mines and upto loading point / sidings are part of "mining service" and are not covered under GTA service. As a result the 75 percent exemption being availed by such mining industries is being denied to them. This is a good decision for such mining industries since their stand o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f classifying the service under "GTA gets vindicated - provided, of course, the department does not go in appeal against the decision. Reply By Dalia Felix: The Reply: sirs, But, whenever the demand was under GTA, assesse contested that the service is not classifiable there and succeeded the case. (As in the case of Bellary Iron & Ores (P.) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum (2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 009 (12) TMI 150 - CESTAT, BANGALORE) =[2010] 24 STT 557 (BANG. - CESTAT). So can we assume that loading and transportation of ores within the mining area is not taxable, as the activity do not come under any of the taxable services listed then? X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|