Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2014 (2) TMI 994

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the Income Tax Act, 1961 („Act‟, for short) and the letter dated 02.11.2011 issued by him fixing the proceedings for further hearing on 16.11.2011. 2. The facts are not much involved. The petitioner is a retired officer of the Indian Revenue Service and served in various capacities including, inter alia, the position of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Director General of Vigilance, Chief Vigilance Officer of the Central Board of Direct Taxes and Income Tax Ombudsman. In respect of the assessment year 2004-05, he filed a return of income declaring a total income of Rs.4,10,917/- consisting of salary income, property income and income from other sources. It was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. On 31.03.2011 a notice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... und that there was no evidence to connect him with certain properties which were alleged in the tax evasion petition to have been acquired by him out of his undisclosed sources of income and further that the contents of the tax evasion petition were found to be factually incorrect. The first respondent wrote the following letter to the petitioner: - "To, Sh. P.K. Misra C/o. Sh. Y. Das B-367, New Friends Colony, New Delhi - 110025 Sir, Sub.: Objections to the re-opening of assessment year 2004-2005 - directions of Hon'ble Delhi High Court - regarding. Hon'ble High Court, Delhi quashed the order of the undersigned dated 25.07.2011 and directed to pass fresh order after affording an opportunity of being heard. It was further directed t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... raised by you. The objection mentioned at "1 & 3" above, the same were disposed off by me vide order dated 25.07.2011. It is only with respect to objection "2" above for which the Hon'ble High Court has quashed the order dated 25.07.2011. There was Tax Evasion Petition in which it was alleged that you had acquired the property bearing no.B-8 ground floor flat with basement and back garden made on 600 sq. yds. Plot, Cosmopolitan Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Hauz Khas, (Shahpur Jat known as May Fare Garden), New Delhi costing not less than 20 crores. Since there were allegations against your goodself w.r.t. purchase of the said property and the enquiries w.r.t. alleged purchase of the said property were not complete and the time limit f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion Petition in your case - regarding. Kindly refer to on going proceedings for A.Y. 2004-2005 in your case. Sh. S. K. Srivastava who is the complainant in this case is proposed to be examined as a witness in support of his allegations against you upon his written request in this regard. Sh. Srivastava has informed this office that he will examine himself as his witness as well as other witness in support of his allegations against you and lead other evidences in the case. The case is fixed for hearing on 16.11.2011. You are hereby informed that you may if you so desire, be present in this office on 16.11.2011 at 11:00 am sharp when the evidence of Sh. S.K. Srivastava is to be taken by this office and if you so want cross examine the wit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inating the proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act by dropping them the first respondent chose inexplicably to keep those proceedings alive. This is illegal and impermissible in law. This amounts to nothing but harassment of the petitioner. There appears to be some vested interest in keeping the proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to the notice dated 31.03.2011 alive. The tax evasion petition and the present proceedings seem to be the result of a personal vendetta between two officers of the Indian Revenue Service (IRS) (the complainant being one of them). This unfortunately has resulted in multiple proceedings before this Court. 7. The respondents have to act in accordance with law and not under any pressure. The AO, b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates