Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (2) TMI 421

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4. 3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Appellant availed and utilized the CENVAT Credit amounting to Rs. 4,20,15,654,00 in the month of July, 2006 on the strength of supplementary invoices dated 30-6-2006 issued by M/s. Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Manali, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as M/s. CPCL) for payment of differential duty on account of supply of Lube Oil Base Stock (LOBS) to the Appellant during the period from October, 2004 to May, 2006. The Department initiated proceedings against M/s. CPCL on the ground that they had suppressed the material facts with intent to evade payment of duty. M/s. CPCL approached the Settlement Commission, which passed an Order on 23-11-2007 accepting payment of addition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... invoices raised by M/s. CPCL. The contention is that the embargo put by Rule 9(1)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, is not applicable to their case, as the allegation of suppression, mis-statement etc. had not been established against M/s. CPCL. The allegations remained the allegations only and were not established at any stage, therefore, the embargo is not applicable. In support of their contention, they have placed reliance on a decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal at Mumbai, in their own case reported in 2011 (274) E.L.T. 561 (Tri.-Mum.), wherein it was held that mere allegation does not prove the charge, unless and until it is proved. They have also placed reliance on a decision of the Larger Bench in the case of Bosch C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ere duty has been paid under exceptional clause of Rule 9(1)(b). For better appreciation, Rule 9(1)(b) of Cenvat credit Rules, 2004 reproduced hereunder : "Rule 9. Documents and accounts. - (1) The CENVAT credit shall be taken by the manufacturer or the provider of output serviced or input service distributor, as the case may be, on the basis of any of the following documents namely :- (a)     .............................. (b)   a supplementary invoice, issued by a manufacturer or importer of inputs or capital goods in terms of the provisions of Central Excise Rules, 2002 from his factory or depot or from the premises of the consignment agent of the said manufacturer or importer or from any other premi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates