Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2014 (5) TMI 457

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd uses the commercial commodity in the execution of works contract, if such commercial commodity purchased by the dealer is not used in the execution of the works contract in the same form in which it was purchased, in such case, what is used in the execution of works contract is a distinct and different commodity. Assessee has admittedly purchased sand, cement, colour and so on, which goods had suffered tax - But when these goods were used in the manufacturing activity, those goods are transformed into another commercial commodity, namely, mosaic - The transaction would be considered as one of sale - Relying upon Apparels and Handloom Exporters Association and Others v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others [2001 (9) TMI 1114 - MADRAS HIGH C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ince there is "manufacture" involved, ignoring the definition of "works contract" u/s 2(u) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, which includes any agreement for carrying out for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, the building, construction, "manufacture", of any moveable or immoveable property and the conclusion of the assessing officer and first appellate authority? 2. Whether the petitioner is entitled for the deduction u/s 3B(2)(b) of the Tamilnadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, in view of the admitted fact that the petitioner had purchased all the goods locally from the registered dealers inside the State of Tamilnadu and also "used" in the execution of works contract in the same "form" in which such goods .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... other goods, he refused to extend the exemption benefit. As to the refusal of the benefit other than chips, the assessee preferred appeals to the Appellate Tribunal. Challenging the grant of exemption to the chips as well, the Revenue also preferred appeals. By the common impugned order, the Tribunal found that the transactions are in the nature of sale and is not works contract and allowed all the appeals in favour of the Revenue. This order has given rise to the cause for the present Tax Case Revisions. 3. Mr.Sundareswaran, learned counsel had extensively argued before us by drawing the relevant provisions of the Act, particularly, Section 3B, Section 2(g)(vi), 2(n)(ii) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. In our opinion, a detaile .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mmodity after purchase by the dealer and when it is used in the execution of the works contract, since the two goods, viz., the commodity purchased by the dealer and the commodity used in the execution of works contract are distinct and different commercial commodities falling under two different sub-items of an entry under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, the question of levying sales tax at more than one stage on the same commodity does not arise. In other words, when the goods used by the dealer in the execution of the works contract is commercially different from the goods purchased by the dealer, falling under different sub-items of an entry under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, the question of contravention of section .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tanding the change in the form of the goods, the changed form in itself being a taxable commercial commodity under a different head, such change should be ignored and the deduction allowed to be claimed by regarding the goods which had been bought by the dealer executing the works contract as the goods used in carrying out the works contract. 11. Article 366(29-A) was not enacted to confer largerbenefits on the persons engaged in carrying out works contract who transferred the properties and the goods used in such contract to the other party to the contract. If a person who is engaged for example in the manufacture of rolling shutters, buys iron and steel for the purpose of manufacture, after paying tax on such purchase, he cannot contend .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates