TMI Blog2010 (12) TMI 1103X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in CST 813611 2004-05 and quash the order dated November 6, 2007 passed therein and further direct the respondent herein to accept and pass orders on the petition filed by the petitioner on June 18, 2007 under section 55 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The writ petition challenging the impugned order passed by the Commercial Tax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not mentioned and required the documents. We have also search the relevant documents. In the meantime you have passed the order and the same was received by us on May 26, 2007. Now we have collected all relevant documents and the same are enclosed for your perusal. Please receive and revise the order. Sorry for the inconvenience caused". The petitioner states that the said letter was not co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ication and the same cannot be permitted under law. There is no illegality or infirmity in the order rejecting such application and it is not in consonance with the decision in 1960 Income-tax Officer, Always v. Asok Textiles Ltd. [1961] 41 ITR 732 (SC).
In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is also closed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|