9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 122X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... I.,C.S.C., It ORDER The petition has been filed by the State of U P and by the Inspector General (Registration), in order to challenge the notices issued under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 requiring Sub Registrars to furnish information in respect of transactions relating to immovable property of a value between Rs. 5,00,000/- and Rs. 30,00,000/-. When the petition initially came ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat a meeting was held on 17 July 2014 between the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow and the Inspector General (Stamps and Registration), Government of Uttar Pradesh. A copy of the minutes is annexed to the affidavit. It is common ground that the dispute has been resolved at the meeting which was held on 17 July 2014. The minutes, inter alia, record as follows: "After discussions, it was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me Tax Act, 1961, for which the SROs can move appeal petition before the appropriate authority. The meeting concluded with the resolution that the SROs shall provide the information called for by the Income Tax Department, as agreed above. However, this shall be without prejudice to the legality of applicability of penal provisions for non-furnishing of information u/s 133(6) in the case of SROs. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
