Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1981 (1) TMI 252

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... m.m. without payment of duty and utilising them in their factory in the manufacture of aluminium utensils. 3. This allegation was based on the fact that on their visit to the factory of the appellants on 29-3-1973, Central Excise Officers had found the thickness of such circles to be between 1.42 m.m. to 1.63 m.m. consequently they seized 639.100 kg. of such aluminium circles, and 625.600 kg. of aluminium circles given the shape of semi-finished and finished aluminium buckets. 4. The seizure case was decided by the Dy. Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh under his order C. No. V(27)DC/15/Seizure/77/3912-15 dated 15-4-1977 and he demanded duty from the appellants on the Aluminium circles cleared from their factory during the period .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the godown of the appellants but from the rolling Section of their factory. There was no warrant for presuming that the circles which were no longer in existence must have been manufactures in thickness exceeding 1.22 m.m. Since the quantity of circles produced and cleared during the period from January, 1973 to March, 1973 had already been included in the order of Dy. Collector, such goods should be excluded from the proceedings in this case. 9. Consequently, on 23-6-1978, representative samples of aluminium circles given the shape of semi-finished/finished buckets drawn from the seized goods were sent to the National Test House (NTH), Alipore. The analysis report received from the Director, N.T.H. showed the thickness of the aluminium .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rd at the personal bearing granted on 7-1-1981 along with two Directors and one Technical Asstt. of the appellant firm. In reiterating the written submissions in the memorandum of the appeal, supplemented by other letters dated 4-2-1980, 13-3- l 980 end 24-4- 1980, he also handed over a written note dated 7-1-1981 for consideration of the Board. 14. During the personal hearing, the appellants also produced samples of Cut Sections of their aluminium buckets in support of their contention that in the ``Deep Drawing Process , the thickness of aluminium circles considerably increases near the edges and that the thickness of a semi-finished bucket as it can only be measured near the edges with a micrometer gauge and not beyond that unless por .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... from the goods seized on 29th and 30th March, 1973 (i.e. admittedly subsequently) would not be relevant to the period prior to the drawal of the samples. 19. In support of this contention they referred to the Supreme Court s judgment in the case of Oudh Sugar Mills and the decision of the Government of India in the case of New Era Hindustan Woollen Mills, Ludhiana. 20. The appellants also urged that during the relevant period there had been a number of visits of the Central Excise Officers to the factory of the appellants. The appellants also produced photostat copies of their daily stock account in Form RG-1 showing as many as 9 visits by the Central Excise Officers to their factory during the period from 16-3-1972 to 28-2-1973, but .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nds from the records that while sending samples to the NTH, this request of the appellants which contained a crucial submission was not brought to the notice of the Director of the N.T.H. 25. The facts on record also confirm that on 12-12-1978, the Asstt. Collector of Central Excise, Rohtak had also conducted an experiment in the factory of the appellants to find out the veracity of the appellants contention on this issue when he noticed that the thickness of the edges of two circles of 1.10 m.m. thickness after Deep Drawing Process varied from 1.33 m.m. to 1.35 m.m. 26. The appellants have also furnished a certificate from the N.T.H. to indicate that the thickness of a manufactured article at various points varies from 1.08 m.m. t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates