9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 350X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate ORDER Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. 1. This order shall dispose of ITA Nos.426 and 428 of 2006 as according to the learned counsel for the parties, the substantial question of law raised in both the appeals is identical. However, the facts are being extracted from ITA No.426 of 2006. 2. ITA No.426 of 2006 has been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment year 1995-96 showing income of Rs. 14,41,02,270/-. The assessee is a manufacturer and exporter of cotton yarn, woolen hosiery garments and also trades in cotton yarn. The assessment was framed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle V, Ludhiana on 17.3.1998, Annexure 1 at income of Rs. 14,46,36,553/-. Deduction under section 80HHC of the Act was reduced as service charges ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tant appeals by the revenue.
4. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue herein stands concluded by the decision of this Court dated 6.3.2014 in ITA No.98 of 2008 in the case of the assessee (Commissioner of Income Tax III, Ludhiana v M/s Nahar Spinning Mills Limited, Ludhiana).
5. In view of the above, the appeals are disposed of in the same terms as in ITA No.98 of 2008. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
