TMI Blog1983 (3) TMI 280X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appeal is directed against the order or the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Bombay, dated 9th April, 1979. Originally it was filed as a Revision Application by the Central Government and on transfer it has been registered as an appeal. 2. The Appellants manufactured industrial tyres which were originally assessed under item 16 of the Central Excise Tariff. Later, however, on 5th March, 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lue and be also subjected to payment of excise duty. (This amount was calculated to be ₹ 4,988). A reply was sent by the appellants but their contention was not accepted and the demand was confirmed. An appeal was preferred before the Appellate Collector who rejected the same on 9th April 1979. This is now the subject matter of this appeal. 4. The Appellate Collector has stated that the d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1979 E.L.T. (J 555), where it was held that :- the words `from the date of making the refund under Rule 10, postulate the date when refund vouchers are issued by the Department and not the date when such vouchers are encashed. Therefore, the date of the issue of voucher is the date from which the period of limitation relevant for issue of a show cause notice in the case of recovery of refund ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
