Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2011 (4) TMI 1265

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd within reasonable time even after receipt of the show-cause notice, where the defects in the C forms were specified. Against assessee. - Writ Petition (C) No. 6982 of 2004 - - - Dated:- 1-4-2011 - HRISHIKESH ROY J. Dr. A.K. Saraf, Senior Advocate, D. Baruah, S.K. Agarwal, Ms. N. Hawelia and Ms. M. Gope for the petitioners R. Dubey for the respondents JUDGMENT Heard Mr. S. K. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Mr. R. Dubey, learned standing counsel represents the Revenue. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as, the AGST Act ) and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as, the CST Act ) with the Superinte .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cising powers under section 17(4) of the AGST Act read with section 9(2) of the CST Act, made fresh assessment by rejecting the six C forms mentioned in the show-cause notice and disallowed the claims by declaring that the assessee is liable to pay tax under section 8(1) of the AGST Act and also under the CST Act. A Bakijai proceeding for recovery of the assessed tax was thereafter initiated by the certificate officer, under the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act. Mr. S. K. Agarwal, learned counsel, refers to the circular dated July 2, 2003 of the Commissioner of Taxes, Nagaland, to show that C forms issued prior to June 11, 2001 by the Nagaland based purchasing dealer to the principal dealer of another State are valid and accordingly th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ached the appellate authority if they Were aggrieved by the reassessment order and are not entitled to invoke the writ jurisdiction of the court, without exhausting the statutory remedy provided to an aggrieved assessee. Mr. Dubey further submits that the assessee in spite of receiving the show-cause notice where the defects in the C forms were indicated, had failed to address the problem till the reassessment was made on July 3, 2003. The counsel points out that the petitioner failed to act with reasonable promptitude after he received the show-cause notice of January 1, 2003 and only because of the default of the petitioner and since the furnished six C forms were invalid, the transactions were considered as sale to unregistered dealer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he assessing authority that the declaration in C forms were inconsistent with the Rules, the assessee obtained fresh C forms and tendered them to the assessing officer at a stage, prior to completion of the assessment. But the assessing authority took the view that he had no power to condone the delay in filing the declaration and accordingly the assessee was held liable to a higher levy of tax. In this case the Madras High Court held that the principles of natural justice would require that when something is discovered at the appellate stage which exposes the assessee to a higher tax, an opportunity must be given to the assessee to rectify the defects within the time granted for the purpose. The facts in the case of Tirukoilur Oil Mills .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... assessee in the instant case was issued a show-cause notice where the specific defects in the six C forms were mentioned and they were given an opportunity to cure the defects. But they failed to avail of this opportunity. Therefore the Revenue cannot be faulted for the lapses of the assessee and the merit of the reassessment cannot be examined now by looking into materials, which were not made available to the assessing officer. Accordingly I find no justification to interfere with the impugned order of reassessment, as it is the assessee who failed to effectively respond within reasonable time even after receipt of the show-cause notice, where the defects in the C forms were specified. It must also be recorded that the petitioners .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates