9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (12) TMI 454X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Respondent : Shri Shobha Ram, Commissioner (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: Ashok Jindal: The main appellant namely Larsen & Toubro Ltd. is in appeal against the impugned order wherein demand of duties of Rs. 1,61,61,27,251/- and Rs. 6,37,544/- have been confirmed along with interest. Penalties have also been imposed on the main appellant as well as on the co-appellants. The goods were also confiscated and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ultimately confiscated with an option to release the goods on payment of redemption fine. Aggrieved by the order, the appellants are before us. 3. Heard both sides and considered the submissions. 4. The issue whether the parts in question are automobile parts or earth moving equipments has come up before this Tribunal in the case of CCE Pune v. JCB India Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-09-CESTAT-MUM wherein t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and confiscation are set aside." Therefore, in this case also we hold that although the appellants have no case on merit but on limitation they are having a case as the show-cause notice dated 09.08.2012 has been issued by invoking extended period of limitation. Hence, the proceedings under the said show-cause notice are set aside. 3.1 As the show-cause notice dated 2 nd December, 2011 for the p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
