Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (1) TMI 587

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er, noticed that the supplier had not reversed SAD while clearing the goods as such to the applicant in the above invoice. Then, the supplier reversed the credit on SAD and issued supplementary invoices to the applicant. The applicant availed Cenvat credit of Rs. 59,12,362/- in the month of December, 2010 on the basis of supplementary invoices issued by the supplier. The Adjudicating authority denied the said credit and confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 59,12,362/- along with interest and penalty of Rs. 30,00,000/- on the applicant on the ground that the applicant availed irregular credit on the basis of supplementary invoices in contravention of Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. 2. The contention of the learned Counsel is t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... xception of Rule 9 (1) (b) would apply only if there is any short payment of Customs duties at the time of import, by reason of fraud, etc., by the importer, which is not the case herein. In this case, all Customs duties were paid properly by the importer at the time of import and while passing on such credit to the applicant, inadvertently, they failed to reverse SAD and there is no short-levy. .  He submits that exception of Rule 9(1)(b) would not at all apply in this case. He also submits that the demand confirmed against the supplier itself would not survive, as there was no recovery mechanism to recover the amount from the supplier and such recovery mechanism was introduced in Rule 3 (5) only from 08.01.2014. At any event, he subm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... evade payment of duty. In the present case, we find that proceeding was initiated against the supplier for recovering of the amount on account of short-levy by reason of fraud, collusion etc. Therefore, prima facie, we are unable to accept the submission of the learned Counsel. The applicant is directed to make pre-deposit Rs. 6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) within a period of six weeks from today. Upon deposit of the said amount, pre-deposit of balance amount would be waived and recovery stayed thereof till the disposal of the appeal. To report compliance on 4th September, 2014. Registry is directed to link this appeal with the suppliers appal as contended by the learned Counsel after compliance of the stay order.
Case laws, Decisi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates