9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (1) TMI 1174X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... S. Jetly, for the Respondent. ORDER Mentioned not on board. In the light of the urgency made out, the appeal is taken up for admission. 2. The appeal is directed against the order of pre-deposit. The contention before us is that the applicant is a Karta of M/s. Jai Aravali Industries which is a HUF (Hindu Undivided Family) while the Tribunal directs the HUF to deposit a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ions of law : - (i) Whether the Tribunal erred in directing the deposit of a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- by the HUF as also separately by the appellant? (ii) Whether the Tribunal should have found as to whether a prima facie case as has been made out by the appellant, was strong enough to give direct complete waiver of duty or of grant partial relief? 5 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ning thereby the appellant would not be required to deposit the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- as directed by the Tribunal, in the event, our order passed today is complied by the HUF. If the order is not complied with, then, the direction issued by the Tribunal shall revive and non-compliance therewith to visit all the consequences in law. In the event, our order is complied, the Tribunal to hear the appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
