Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (2) TMI 80

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Phase - I, RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi, under proviso to section 28 (i) of Customs Act, 1962 (herein after referred to as 'the Act') with interest thereon under Section 28AB of the Act. (iii) Penalty of Rs. 43,97,261/- was imposed under Section 114 A of the Act on M/s. Five Core Electronics Ltd. However, concession thereon was allowed subject to deposit of duty and interest thereon within thirty days from the date of communication of the adjudication order. Accordingly such penalty was worked out to be Rs. 10,99,315/- which is 25% of the duty amount. (iv) Penalty of Rs. 10,00,000/- was imposed on Shri Amarjit Singh Kalra, Director of M/s. Five Core Electronics Ltd. under Section 112(b) of the Act. 2.1 It was held in adjudication tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... olation of the condition of notification. 3.2 Appellant further submitted that a show cause notice was issued on 02/07/2008 in respect of the clearance made against the import of the period 01/05/2006-31/03/2007. Therefore when the import was within the knowledge of the authority, and use of imported goods in manufacture of exportable goods were also on record, there cannot be any suspicion as to the suppression of the facts. The activity of 'degaussing' and 'alignment' of CRT amounts to manufacture as is explained in page 50, para (ii) & (iii) of the adjudication order. Use of imported goods in such manufacture cannot be doubted when DTA sale was made as per permission. Assertion of revenue that the activity of degaussing did not amount .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sable. 3.4 Ld. Counsel for the appellant relied on the decision of Tribunal in the case of STL Exports Ltd. Vs. CC, Indore [2004 (164) ELT 179 (Tri. - Del.)] to submit that upon demand of central excise duty, there cannot be demand of custom duty in respect of the same product and for the same period under para - 7 of Notification No.53/97-Cus. Reliance was also placed on Larger Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of Weston Electronics Ltd. Vs. CC, Delhi-III [2001 (130) ELT 451 (Tri. - LB)] to submit that yamming process is fixing the deflection yoke with the picture and then adjusting them electronically to keep proper light rays on screen. This process amounts to manufacturing and a new and distinct article known in the market as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er surface to make them better looking and further use. 4.2 Revenue precisely submits that degaussing does not amount to manufacture and cabinet re-painting is also not manufacture. 4.3 Heard both sides and perused the record. 5.1 Ld. Adjudicating Authority while examining the contentions of the appellant as well as the evidence on record has found that CPT and PMC were removed from DTA without carrying out any manufacture activity because the CPT and cabinet imported were not mentioned to be any raw-material in the Bill of Entry as well as invoices of the exporter. Degaussing does not amount to manufacture because it does not change the character and nature of the input. CPT itself were imported. Those were capable of performing their o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... manufacturing of CPT and cabinet activity carried out by them. Degaussing and spray painting is not known in trade parlance as manufacturing activity. When the goods imported were declared to be used in manufacturing process, but not so used, the duty foregone on import thereof is recoverable. The goods sold in DTA were the imported CPT and PMC misconceiving that manufacturing was done. Thus, the benefit of Notification claimed is not tenable and plea of excise duty is immaterial. Customs duty is recoverable. 7. The dispute being on the claim whether the activity amounts to manufacture there shall not be levy of penalty. 8. Shri Amarjit Singh Kalra, Director appears to have conscious knowledge about duty forgone by State at the time of im .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates