Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

Minutes of the 60th meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 8th November 2013 to consider proposals for setting up Special Economic Zones and other miscellaneous proposals

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inancial year, up to 30.09.2013, have been to the tune of ₹ 2,46,646 crores registering a growth of 3% over the exports of the corresponding period of FY 2011-12. Item No. 60.1: Proposals for setting up of SEZs (i) Proposal of M/s. Kerala State IT Infrastructure Ltd. (KSITIL), for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES at Muringur and Thekkumuri Villages, Mukundapuram Talu, Koratty Panchayath, Thrissur District, Kerala, over an area of 7.4909 hectares. The Board noted that the Developer was in possession of the land. The Government of Kerala had also recommended the proposal for formal approval vide their letter dated 14.06.2013. Accordingly, the Board decided to grant formal approval to the proposal of M/s. Kerala State IT Infrastructure Ltd. (KSITIL), for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES at Muringur and Thekkumuri Villages, Mukundapuram Talu, Koratty Panchayath, Thrissur District, Kerala, over an area of 7.4909 hectares. (ii) Proposal of M/s. Transcendent Developers Pvt. Ltd., for setting up of a sector specific Special Economic Zone for IT/ITES at Wagholi Bhavadi, Taluka Haveli, Dist. Pune, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... developer agreement entered into with the developer. (iii) Request of M/s. GSPC LNG Ltd. for co-developer in the multi product SEZ at Mundra, Kutch, Gujart, being developed by M/s. Adani Port and Special Economic Zone Ltd alongwith specific authorized operations. The Board heard the representatives of M/s GSPC LNG Ltd. It was noted by the Board that the Environment Clearance of the project had not been received. Certain other details relating to the proposed operations of the company were sought which the applicant agreed to provide. After deliberations, the Board decided that the matter be decided after examination on file by DoC. Item No. 60.3 : Request for decrease in area of SEZ (i) Request of M/s. APIIC Limited for decrease in area of the sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES at Gambheeram Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh After deliberation, the Board approved the proposal of M/s. APIIC Limited for decrease in area by 10.66 hectares from the existing area of 20.76 hectares of the SEZ thereby making the total balance area of the SEZ as 10.109 hectares. The approval is subject to the DC furnishing a certificate in the prescribed format c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , 2013 (beyond 4th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for one year i.e. up to 31st October, 2014. (ii) Request of M/s. Myron Realtors Pvt. Ltd. for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES at Santhal Junction, Taluka Sanand, District Ahmedabad, Gujarat, beyond 12th November, 2013 (beyond 5th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for six months i.e. up to 12th May, 2014. (iii) Request of M/s. Opto Infrastructure Ltd. for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for Manufacturing Equipments, Devices, Accessories and Consumable for Medical Applications at Hassan, Karnataka, beyond 23th September 2013 (beyond 5th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for one year i.e. up to 23rd September, 2014. (iv) Request of Kerala State Information Technology Infrastructure Limited for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (x) Request of M/s. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES at IT Plot (IIF/3), Area-II, New Town, Kolkata, beyond 13th December 2013 (beyond 5th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for one year i.e. up to 13th December, 2014. (xi) Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ Private Limited for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES-A at Ulwe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, beyond 24th October 2013 (beyond 6 th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for one year i.e. up to 24th October, 2014. (xii) Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ Private Limited for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES-B at Ulwe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, beyond 24th October 2013 (beyond 6 th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for one year i.e. up to 24th October, 2014 (xiii) Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 13 i.e till 8th May, 2014. (xix) Request of M/s. Unitech Infracon Ltd. for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES at Plot No. TZ - 04, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, beyond 22nd May, 2013 (beyond 6th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for six months from 8th November, 2013 i.e till 8th May, 2014. (xx) Request of M/s. Lodha Dwellers Pvt. Ltd. for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES at village Narivali, Taluka District Thane, Maharashtra, beyond 2nd May, 2013 (beyond 6th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for one year i.e. up to 2nd May, 2014. (xxi) Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ Private Limited for extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of multi product at Dronagiri, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, beyond 29th July 2013 (beyond 6th year) The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for one year i.e. up to 29th July, 2014. (xxii) Request of M/s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tivity during the period since the last extension granted by the BoA on account of a land dispute with Municipal Corporation of Gurgaon. The representative of Gov. of Haryana was also heard by the BoA, who recommended that further extension be permitted to the developer. The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the formal approval for a period of six months i.e. up to 05th May 2014, subject to the final outcome of the pending land dispute with the Municipal Corporation of Gurgaon. Item No. 60.6: Request for de-notification (i) Request from Rajasthan State Industrial Development Investment Corporation Limited (RIICO), a sector specific SEZ for Handicraft at Boranada, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, for de-notification of its SEZ notified over an area of 72.37 hectares. After deliberations, the Board decided to approve the proposal of Rajasthan State Industrial Development Investment Corporation Limited (RIICO) for de-notification of the sector specific SEZ for Handicraft at Boranada, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, notified over an area of 72.37 hectares. The approval is subject to the DC furnishing a certificate in the prescribed format certifying inter alia that the d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e year i.e. up to 30th September, 2014. (v) Request of M/s Sterling Biotech Ltd., a unit in Sterling SEZ at Bharuch, Gujarat for extension of validity period of its LoP beyond 30th September, 2013 The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the LoP for a period of one year i.e. up to 30th September, 2014. (vi) Request of M/s. Vigor Laboratories, a unit in Indore SEZ at Indore, Madhya Pradesh for extension of validity period of its LoP beyond 21st July, 2013 The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the LoP for a period of one year i.e. up to 21st July, 2014. (vii) Request of M/s Colour Chips New Media Limited, a unit in APIIC IT SEZ at Madhurvada, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh for extension of validity period of its LoP beyond 4th March, 2013 The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the LoP for a period of one year i.e. up to 4th March, 2014. (viii) Request of M/s Amtech Electronics (India) Ltd., a unit in GIDC SEZ at Gandhinagar, Gujarat for extension of validity period of its LoP beyond 6th September 2012 The Board after deliberations extended the validity of the LoP for a period of 6 months from 8th November, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s Pvt. Ltd. (xxvi) Sukhi India Pvt. Ltd. (xxvii) Nara Exim Pvt. Ltd. (xxviii)M/s. Mclloyd Polymers Pvt. Ltd. After deliberations, in view of the provisions of Rule 18(4) of the SEZ Rules , the Board granted in-principle approval for renewal of LoPs of the above 28 units dealing in business of recycling of plastic in SEZs for a period of five years, subject to the conditions (i) All conditions stipulated as per DoC s policy Guidelines of 17th Sept, 2013 are to be made applicable while granting such approval. (ii) Specifically as per para (x) of the above guidelines the Units in addition to meeting their NFE obligation are required to ensure that the prescribed minimum percentage of the unit s annual turnover is physically exported out of the country. The minimum physical export levels prescribed at the end of specified periods is as follows: Period Minimum Physical Export Obligation At the end of 2 nd year Not less than 40% of the total annual turnover At the end of 4 th year Not less than 80% of the total annual turnover .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d. (xii) U.S. Clothing (India) Pvt. Ltd. (xiii) Safari Fine Clothing Pvt. Ltd. (xiv) C.J. Plastics Pvt. Ltd. After deliberations, in view of the provisions of Rule 18(4) of the SEZ Rules , the Board granted in-principle approval for renewal of LoPs of the above 14 units dealing in the business of worn and used clothing in SEZs for a period of five years, subject to the conditions (i) All conditions stipulated as per DoC s policy Guidelines of 17th Sept, 2013 are to be made applicable while granting such approval. (ii) Specifically as per para (x) of the above guidelines the Units in addition to meeting their NFE obligation are required to ensure that the prescribed minimum percentage of the unit s annual turnover is physically exported out of the country. The minimum physical export levels prescribed at the end of specified periods is as follows: Period Minimum Physical Export Obligation At the end of 2 nd year Not less than 40% of the total annual turnover At the end of 4 th year Not less than 80% of the total annual turnover .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant will be set up in the non-processing area of the proposed Engineering SEZ. Further that the power plant under construction in the SEZ would be captive in nature for supply of power to the SEZ units. The developer had given an undertaking that no duty benefit will be availed on investments made prior to notification of the SEZ. The Board after deliberations decided to approve the request of the developer for change in sector from Power to Engineering and that the power plant will be strictly captive in nature, will be set-up in the non-processing area and will not get duty benefits for the investments made prior to notification of the SEZ. (iii) Proposal of M/s. MMG Impex, a unit in MEPZ for manufacture of additional items The Board noted that the unit has applied for fresh LoP for manufacture of following items:- (i) Sandalwood handicraft products (ii) Sandalwood machine made products (iii)Sandalwood chips (upto 50 grams per piece) (iv)Sandalwood power/dust (v) Sandalwood flakes/scrap/waste The representative of MoEF expressed his reservations on the said proposal. The Board after deliberations decided to reject the proposal. (iv) Proposal of M/s. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to approve the above three proposals for transfer of unit, subject to condition that: a) The unit which had availed of tax incentives under the Income Tax Act for a certain period of time would be eligible for such incentives for the balance period only, as allowed under the Income Tax Act , after its relocation. b) The assessing officer under the Income Tax Act , shall have the right to assess the taxability arising out of the transfer of the unit. c) The unit would be liable to refund the duty incentives availed on such assets which are not shifted to the new location of the unit. (x) Request from M/s. Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd., developer of sector specific SEZ for Copper at Vilage Veerapandiapuram, Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu for approval of its amalgamation with M/s. Sesa Goa Ltd. and for change of name of the SEZ to M/s. Sesa Sterlite Ltd. The Board approved the request of M/s. Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. for name change of developer to M/s. Sesa Sterlite Ltd. pursuant to amalgamation of M/s. Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. with M/s. Sesa Goa Ltd., subject to:- (i) Seamless continuity of the SEZ activities with unaltered responsibilities and obligations .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er. The Board after deliberations decided to approve the proposal subject to each co-developer entity independently fulfilling the following conditions: (i) Seamless continuity of the SEZ activities with unaltered responsibilities and obligations for the altered co-developer entity; (ii) Fulfillment of all eligibility criteria applicable to co-developers, including security clearances etc., by the altered co-developer entity and its constituents; (iii) Applicability of and compliance with all Revenue / Company Affairs /SEBI etc. rules which regulate issues like capital gains, equity change, transfer, taxability etc. (iv) Full financial details relating to the transfer of equity shall be furnished immediately to the Member (IT) CBDT, Department of Revenue. (v) The assessing officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961 , shall have the right to assess the taxability of the amount arising out of the transfer of equity. (vi) The applicants shall comply with relevant State Government laws, including those relating to lease of land, as applicable. (vii) The applicants shall maintain separate books of accounts for its co-developer function distinct from its SEZ unit. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... upplementary Agenda Item No. 60.13 : Requests for de-notification (i) Request from M/s. Parsvnath Infra Ltd. (formerly Parsvnath SEZ Limited), a sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES at Sahastra Dhara Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, for de-notification of its SEZ notified over an area of 13.5426 hectares. The Board noted that Govt of Uttarakhand has given their no objection to the denotification proposal of the Developer. After deliberations, the Board decided to approve the proposal of M/s. Parsvnath Infra Ltd. (formerly Parsvnath SEZ Limited) for denotification of the sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES at Sahastra Dhara Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, notified over an area of 13.5426 hectares. The approval is subject to the DC furnishing a certificate in the prescribed format certifying inter alia that the developer has either not availed or has refunded all the tax/duty benefits availed under SEZ Act / Rules in respect of the area to be de-notified, there are either no units in the SEZ or the same have been debonded, the State Govt has no objection to the de-notification proposal and subject to stipulations communicated vide DoC s letter No. D.12/45/2009-SEZ dated 13.09.2013 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o M/s. Renew Plastics in KASEZ in the business of plastic recycling in the SEZ. Please see the decision taken in item no. 60.8(i) above. Item No. 60.17: Appeals before BoA (i) Appeal of M/s. Biomedical Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., a unit in pharmaceutical SEZ developed by M/s. Zydus Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. at Ahmedabad, Gujarat against order of DC KASEZ The Board after hearing the appellant and subsequent deliberations decided to remand the case back to the DC, KASEZ with the direction to give a hearing to the unit and the developer and pass speaking order within 30 days. The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the Chair. ********* Annexure - 1 List of Participants for the Meeting of the Board of Approval for Special Economic Zones held on 8th November, 2013 under the Chairmanship of Commerce Secretary, Department of Commerce 1. Shri S. R. Rao, Chairman, BOA Commerce Secretary, Department of Commerce. 2. Shri A.K. Pujari, DGFT, Director General of Foreign Trade 3. Shri Ram Tirath, DGEP, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance 4. Dr. L. B. Singhal, Additional DGFT, Director General of Foreign Trade 5. Ms. Deepshikha Sharma, Dep .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates