TMI Blog2015 (3) TMI 215X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gareni Colleries Company Ltd. and M/s. ONGC Ltd., the service tax liability amounted to ₹ 6 crores. There is no evidence placed before us with regard to the contention that the service tax demand confirmed in the impugned order is incorrect or what is the correct amount of service tax demand that the appellant is liable to pay. In the absence of any such evidence, we are unable to agree with ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rvices undertaken by the appellant during the period 01/06/2007 to 30/09/2009. He also imposed the penalties under the provisions of Finance Act, 1994. Aggrieved of the same, the appellant is in appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that there are gross errors committed by the Department in the computation of service tax demand and therefore the confirmation of demand is not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppellant which they did not avail. Therefore the adjudicating authority was constrained to adjudicate the matter based on the evidences on record. The appellant has not made out a prima facie case for grant of stay. Accordingly, he pleads that the appellant be put to terms. 4. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides. The learned adjudicating authority in para 16 of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... contention that the service tax demand confirmed in the impugned order is incorrect or what is the correct amount of service tax demand that the appellant is liable to pay. In the absence of any such evidence, we are unable to agree with the contention of the appellant that the service tax demand confirmed in the impugned order is incorrect. 5. As regards the contention of the appellant that he ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hall stand waived and recovery thereof stayed during the pendency of the appeal. 6. The learned counsel for the appellant is present in the court and has noted the directions given above and that constitutes sufficient notice to the appellant to comply with the order of predeposit. In default, this order would stand dissolved and the appeal liable to be dismissed without any further notice. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
