Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad Versus M/s. Asarwa Mills And Others, M/s. Asoka Spintex Ltd And Others

2015 (4) TMI 816 - SUPREME COURT

Valuation of goods - Captive consumption - Misdeclaration of value of goods - Non inclusion of value of administrative overheads, bonus, gratuity, interest, conversion charges and depreciation charges in the assessable value of the yarn - Held that:- While issuing the clarification as to how the Gross Profit, i.e., profit before depreciation and taxation or 'Profit before tax' or any other profit has to be arrived at, it is also clarified that for the purposes of calculation of value of goods ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in the cost of production. The period with which we are concerned is prior to October, 1996, i.e., April, 1994 to September, 1996. It, therefore, cannot be said that the respondents-companies made intentional misdeclaration with the purpose to avoid payment of correct excise duty. We thus, find that the CESTAT was right in holding that extended period of limitation would not be applicable in the present case. - Decided against Revenue. - Civil Appeal Nos. 5007-5024 of 2004, Civil Appeal Nos. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Adv., Mr Devan Parikh, Sr. Adv., Ms Nandini Gore, Adv., Mr Abhishek Roy, Adv., Ms Devina Sehgal, Adv., Ms Khushboo Bari, Adv., Mrs Manik Karanjawala, Adv., Mr V Lakshmikumaran, Adv., Mr M P Devanath, Adv., Mr Vivek Sharma, Adv., Ms L Charanaya, Adv., Mr Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv., Mr R Ramachandran, Adv., Mr Hemant Bajaj, Adv., Mr Ambarish Pandey, Adv., Mr Rajesh Kumar, Adv. and Mr Anandh K, Adv. ORDER Civil Appeal Nos. 5007-5024 of 2004 The respondents herein are engaged in the manufacturing of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Cost Audit Report furnished by their cost accountants. Thereafter, an investigation was held and it was further observed that the respondents had not included the value of administrative overheads, bonus, gratuity, interest, conversion charges and depreciation charges in the assessable value of the yarn. Show cause Notices were served upon the respondents in the year 1999 demanding differential duty along with interest. The notices alleged that there had been duty evasion. The said show cause n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

red appeals before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as 'CESTAT'). CESTAT vide its common order dated 13.02.2004 allowed the appeals on the ground that the larger period of limitation was not invocable against the respondents herein and accordingly set aside the demands of duty on them. It was also held that the cost accountants were the experts authorized by the law to do the costing of production of the goods and their duly certifie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ll these respondent-companies were issued sometime in the year 1999 which was much beyond the period of six months stipulated in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The Department took the plea that the extended period of limitation contained in the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 11A would be applicable because of the reason that there was intentional misstatement or declarations by the respondent-companies in order to evade taxes. The CESTAT has found it otherwise. Two things which ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

us, interest, gratuity, etc. were to be included because of the Cost Accounting Records (Textile) Rules, 1977 and particularly Performance C thereof. (2) There was some misunderstanding about the inclusion of these costs for the purposes of attracting excise duty, not only with the respondents-assessees but within the Department as well. Therefore, error if any was clearly bona fide and not with the object of evading excise duty. After hearing the counsel for the parties on both sides and going .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Accounting Records (Textile) Rules, 1977, we find that these Rules specifically deal with the inclusion of overheads, yarn/cloth in grey stage for self consumption, and costs statements which are mentioned in Rule VII, XI and XIII respectively. Insofar as the overheads are concerned, Rule VII stipulates that details of administrative, selling and distribution overheads and the amounts applicable to yarn cloth and processed cloth shall be maintained in such a manner so as to enable the company t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rusal of Proformae B and C shall reveal a vast difference between the two. As per Proforma B, it is the statement showing the cost of production of yarn count wise for the year ending which is to be shown. Proforma C, on the other hand, relates to cost of yarn sold during the year. Thus, for arriving at cost of yarn sold during the year in the said Proforma, cost of bonus, interest, gratuity is to be included. It would be pertinent to mention here that to arrive at cost of packed yarn, certain s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de the cost of bonus, interest and gratuity which otherwise was not of relevance insofar as the matter of excise is concerned. We also find that earlier there was some ambiguity and it was not clear as to whether cost of labour, bonus, etc., is to be included while arriving at the cost of captive consumption of this item. This was clarified only vide circular dated 30.10.1996 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, New Delhi on the subject of 'Assessable Value in the case of Goods .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version