GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (6) TMI 138 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2015 (6) TMI 138 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - TMI - Entitlement to the exemption under Section 54EC - Held that:- The present Tax Appeal is ADMITTED to consider the following substantial question of law - Whether the ITAT is justified in law as well as on facts in coming to the conclusion that the assessee is entitled to the exemption under Section 54EC of ₹ 1 Crore instead of ₹ 5 lakhs ignoring the amendment in Section 54EC by Finance Act (2) of 2014, which is clarificatory in nature?

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ision to the aforesaid decisions - Decided against revenue.

Disallowance of expenditure - ITAT allowed the claim - Held that:- The learned CIT(A) has given independent and elaborate reasons while restricting the disallowance of expenditure of ₹ 10,90,223/- and granted the relief to the assessee to the extent of ₹ 6,09,870/- on each item. We see no reason to interfere with the finding recorded by the learned CIT(A) confirmed by the learned Tribunal restricting the disallowa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 05/12/2014 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal") in ITA No.440/RJT/2012 for the Assessment Year 2008-09, the revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeal with the following proposed substantial questions of law; (A) Whether the ITAT is justified in law as well as on facts in coming to the conclusion that the assessee is entitled to the exemption u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(C) Whether the ITAT is justified in law as well as on facts in directing the Assessing Officer to allow expenses amount to ₹ 6,09,870/- debited in P & L account ignoring the fact that no business had been carried out by the assessee during the year? [2.0] Now so far as the proposed substantial question of law no.(A) is concerned, from the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Tribunal it appears that the learned Tribunal has relied upon its earlier decision in the case of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

MITTED to consider the following substantial question of law; (A) Whether the ITAT is justified in law as well as on facts in coming to the conclusion that the assessee is entitled to the exemption under Section 54EC of ₹ 1 Crore instead of ₹ 5 lakhs ignoring the amendment in Section 54EC by Finance Act (2) of 2014, which is clarificatory in nature? [3.0] Now so far as the proposed question no.(B) i.e., whether the ITAT is justified in law as well as on facts in directing the Assessi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aya Machinery (P) Ltd reported in (2013) 29 Taxmann 380 (Guj.) and another decision of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. Polestar Industries reported in (2013) Taxmann 423 (Guj.). The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue is not in a position to show any contrary decision to the aforesaid decisions. He is also not in a position to dispute that the aforesaid question no.(B) is squarely covered against the revenue in view of the aforesaid two decisions of this Court. Under the circums .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version