GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (6) TMI 269 - CESTAT BANGALORE

2015 (6) TMI 269 - CESTAT BANGALORE - 2015 (39) S.T.R. 687 (Tri. - Bang.) , [2016] 92 VST 32 (CESTAT) - Penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 - before issue of show-cause notice, the entire amount of tax was paid and before issue of adjudication order, interest was also paid - Held that:- appellant was not aware of the provisions of law and as a result, continued to operate as they were operating earlier. The fact is that both the Revenue as well as the assessee are relying upon the balance sheet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an make the payment with interest and lenient view can be taken as regards penalty in cases where there is lack of knowledge and reasonable cause. The very fact that the section continues to be in existence for a long time shows that the intention of the Government is to provide relief where there is a reasonable cause for failure to make payment and Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in the case of CCE Vs. Muniruddin [2013 (10) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] has taken a view that even ignorance of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ant is a Multi System Operator (MSO) service provider and this service was brought under purview of service tax levy w.e.f 10/09/2004. The appellant who is an individual proprietor did not pay service tax and when the authorities paid a visit to the appellant, the Accountant of the appellant in his statement dt. 17/02/2007 stated that the appellant was not aware of the introduction of levy of service tax on MSO service provider and advertising agency service and therefore they had not paid the t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e is only against imposition of penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994. 2. The learned counsel submits that appellant had no intention to evade service tax and they had not collected the same and as soon as it was pointed out, they had paid the tax. It is his submission that under the circumstances, penalties imposed under various sections can be waived by invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act. Further he also submits that the observations of the original adjudicating authori .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rly submitted that they were not collecting service tax, the observations made by the lower authorities have no basis. Reliance was placed on the decision in the case of Ice Network Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CST, Bangalore [2010 (20) STR 59 (Tri. Ban.)] to submit that in cases like this, it can be said that there was a reasonable cause for non-payment of tax and penalties can be waived by invoking provisions of Section 80 of Finance Act, 1994. 3. The learned AR would submit that in this case extended period .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version