Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Infosys Technologies Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune- I

Denial of refund claim - Classification of service - Consulting Engineers Service or Maintenance or Repair Service - Difference of opinion - matter is placed before the Hon'ble President for reference to the Third Member on the following points:-

(i) Whether under the facts and circumstances, software will be treated as 'goods' w.e.f. 9.7.2004 in view of clarification vide Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue's letter F.No. 256/1/2006-CX.4 dated 7.3.2006 read with Circular No. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ervices under Section 65(105)(r), (iv) consultation and management in respect of ERP software implementation, and accordingly entitled to refund, as claimed, the services being admittedly exported.

And

As the appellant have rendered taxable services under Section 65(105)(zzg), the appellant have rightly availed CENVAT Credit under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as held by Member (Judicial).

Or

1) Whether refund of Cenvat Credit under Rule 5 of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e remanded back to him to enable him to examine all the contracts before arriving at a decision on the issue at 2 above. - Appeal No. ST/126/08 - Dated:- 5-6-2015 - Anil Choudhary, Member (J) And P S Pruthi, Member (T),JJ. For the Appellant : Shri A Anand, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri D Nagvenkar, Addl Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: P S Pruthi: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals),who had upheld the order of the adjudicating authority in rejecting the r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d two refund claims for refund of input service tax credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules for the period July, 2005 to Sept. 2005 and for the period October, 2005 to December, 2005. Later, the appellants revised the amount of refund claim and reduced the claims to ₹ 2,47,27,422/- and ₹ 32,34,635/- respectively as they realized that the refund of CENVAT Credit attributable to inputs used in the non-taxable output services namely, software development and software consultancy .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m their coverage during the period in dispute. Hence, being non-taxable, CENVAT Credit is not available on the input services as per Rule 3 which allows credit only to provider of taxable services and as per Rule 6(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, which bars availment of CENVAT Credit used in the exempted services. The Commissioner (Appeals) agreed with the order of the adjudicating authority holding that the service provided/exported does not fall in the category of maintenance or repair service but .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Maintenance and Repair Services under Section 65(105)(zzg) and Management Consultancy Services in relation to ERP implementation under Section 65(105) (r) of the Finance Act, 1994, both taxable services. He drew attention to a series of notifications and the Board's Circular on the issue of Maintenance and Repair of software. Initially the maintenance and repair of computers, computer systems or computer peripherals was exempted under Notification No.20/2003-ST dated 21/8/2003. This noti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elation to maintenance or repair or servicing of software is leviable to Service Tax under Section 65(105)(zzg). The learned Counsel also stated that ERP software system provided by a management consultant in connection with the management of any organization is exempted under Notification No.16/04-ST dated 10.9.2004 and therefore is clearly a taxable service. Therefore, refund of input credit accumulated due to export of Maintenance and Repair Service, ERP Consultancy Service is admissible. Hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

held that on export of software service, asessees were entitled to refund even when the service exported is not taxable. 4. The learned Addl. Commissioner (AR) reiterates the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). 5. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. 5.1 The appellants contend that the software exported by them is classifiable under the Maintenance or Repair Service covered under Section 65(105(zzg), whereas the Commissioner classified the service provided as Con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion to management, maintenance or repair." Revenue's contention is that because the Consulting Engineers Service specifically excluded Software Engineering from its scope during the relevant period, therefore, the same is non-taxable. By holding the output services to be non-taxable, it was concluded that CENVAT Credit on input services is not admissible under Rule 3 and Rule 6 and therefore, refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is consequently n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the service, namely, Software Development and Software Consultancy, the appellant is not claiming refund on the input service credit in respect of these output services, which are non-taxable as they are excluded from the definition of Consulting Engineers Service, as discussed above. 5.4 As regards the remaining software service, which appellant have termed as 'management, maintenance or repair of software service, we find merit in appellant's contention that no satisfactory reasoning h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gistered with Service Tax Department under the category of 'Maintenance and Repair Service' which was never questioned or annulled. The appellant also explained to the lower authorities the meaning of 'software maintenance' which, according to the technical literature submitted by them is described hereunder:- "Software maintenance may be defined by describing four activities that are undertaken after a program is released for use viz., corrective maintenance, adoptive maint .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ves changing the software to improve some of its qualities. Hence, changes are due to the need to modify the functions offered by the application, add new functions, improve the performance of the application, make it easier to use, etc. The requests to perform perfective maintenance may come directly from the software engineer, in order to improve the status of the product on the market, or they may come from the customer, to meet some new requirements." From this literature, it can be inf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evelopment and software consultancy was, in any case, deleted from the refund claim by the appellant. 5.5 Before analyzing the issue further, we may refer to the relevant provisions of law as they stood during the material time. The period of dispute in this case is July 05 to Dec. 05, CENVAT Credit is allowed under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. During the material time, Rule 3 stated that - "A manufacturer or producer of final products or a provider of taxable service shall be a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

39; means any service; i) used by a provider of taxable service for providing on output service; or ii) ..................... The appellant sought refund under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Rule 5 as it stood during the material time stated that - "where any input or input service is used in the manufacture of final product which is cleared for export under bond or letter of undertaking, as the case may be, or used in the intermediate product cleared for export, or used in providing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd limitation, as may be specified, by the Central Government, by notification." It is clear from the above Rules that credit on input services was allowed only to provider of taxable service. Further, the refund under Rule 5 was allowed to manufacturers only. For service provider, there was a system of rebate of duty paid on excisable inputs or input services under Notification No. 12/2005-ST dated 19.4.2005. It was only in 2006, vide Notification No. 4/2006 dated 14.3.2006 that Rule 5 was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ned the issue from the classification angle. He has not examined whether the refund was admissible to service provider under Rule 5, as it stood during the period in question. 5.6 Another issue to be examined is whether taxable services were provided by the appellant. This is an important point because Rule 3 permitted credit on input services only to provider of taxable services. In case, the output services which are exported are determined to be non-taxable, the question of taking input servi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

With due respect to the Hon'ble High Court, the point to be considered here is whether the input service credit itself was admissible before the refund can be considered. As shown above, Rule 3 permitted input service credit only if used for providing taxable service. Thus, it would be important to consider whether the services exported were taxable services. 5.7 We note that the Maintenance or Repair Service under Section 65(64), under which the appellant classified their output service to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing or restoration, or servicing of any goods, excluding a motor vehicle;] [Explanation.- For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that for the purposes of this clause,- (a) "goods" includes computer software; (b) "properties" includes information technology software;]" However, during the relevant time in 2005, the definition of Maintenance or Repair service did not specifically refer to "goods" including computer software or "properties" inc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9;s Circular No. 81/2/2005-ST (supra) clarified that Software incorporated in a Media for use is to be treated as goods. It did not distinguish between Computer Software and Information Technology Software. In view of the Board's Circular, it would be justifiable to consider the software in question in this case as Computer Software. 5.8 Having said so, the next question which arises is whether the software in question was taxable or not. To decide this, the issue to be determined is whether .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e clauses of some of the contracts under which services were exported and came to the conclusion that the services are covered under exclusion clause of Section 65(105)(r). He has not examined why the software maintenance which includes corrective maintenance, adoptive maintenance and perfective maintenance, or enhancement and preventive maintenance or re-engineering cannot be categorized under software maintenance and repair service. He has not distinguished between the software development ser .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d keeping in view the evidence presented by the appellant. He should also consider the provisions of Service Tax law as they stood during the material time to arrive at an appropriate decision. The impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed by way of remand. (Pronounced in Court on .....................) Per: Shri Anil Choudhary: 7. I have gone through the order recorded by my learned brother Shri P.S. Pruthi, Hon'ble Member (Technical), as I do not fully agree with the order, I am re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

period in dispute for which the appellant is claiming refund. The subsequent clarifications by CBE&C Circular No. 81/2/2005-ST dated 7.10.2005 and Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue's dated 7.3.2006 have been issued in pursuance to the judgment of the Apex Court in the TCS case (supra). Thus, the software is required to be treated as goods through out for the purpose of levy of tax w.e.f. 05.11.2004, when the law was so declared by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, there is no ele .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t service which remains unutilized, the exporter is entitled to refund of such unutilized credit on furnishing of the particulars of tax paid by them. Such refund cannot even be denied on the ground of limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. It was also held that the registration with the Service Tax Department is not a pre-requisite for claiming the credit and resultant refund. Further, in the facts and circumstances, I hold that the assessee has rightly classified the service i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pra). Thus, the amendment being clarificatory in nature, will be applicable with retrospective effect i.e. from the date when the Section was brought on statute. Accordingly, I hold that the appellant have rightly taken CENVAT Credit and is entitled to refund. Thus, the appeal is allowed with consequential benefit in accordance with law. The refund shall be worked out by the adjudicating authority expeditiously preferably within a period of two months, from receipt of a copy of this order and th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version