9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (7) TMI 137X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ction 35F of the Central Excise Act ('the Act'), which is also applicable to the appeals arising out of demands under the Finance Act, 1994, the Service Tax Authorities have directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 75,00,000/- in addition to the amount of Rs. 11,00,000/- which was paid by the assessee during the investigation. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the appellant that the C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y not be the same as the amount of duty demanded or penalty imposed in the Order-in- Original in the said case. In Para 2.2 of the circular it is provided that the pre-deposit will be governed on the aggregate of all penalties imposed in the order against which appeal is proposed to be filed. The circular dated 16.09.2014 was issued on the same day when the impugned order was passed. It becomes o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Office of Mr.V.K.Mathur, counsel appearing for the Central Excise Department which shall be sufficient service on the respondents. The matter will come up for hearing on 09.02.2015. In the meanwhile, effect and operation of the order dated 16.09.2014 (Annex.5) passed by CESTAT shall remain stayed provided the appellant deposits 10% of the amount of duty excluding interest and penalty within o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
