Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Cafco Frieght Systems Pvt Ltd and Others Versus Commissioner of Customs Cochin

Under-valuation of goods - Imported computer parts - penalties imposed upon the CHA and its Managing Director separately - Held that:- As regards M/s. Indam Recycling Pvt. Ltd., we find that the demand of duty to the extent of ₹ 63.46 lakhs stand confirmed on the finding of under-valuation of the computer parts. Learned AR brings it to our notice that the appellant, during the course of investigations, have accepted the under-valuation. Further one of the live consignments, where the inves .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lant. - C/Stay/237, 242, 241, 238, 243, 239, 240/2007 in C/607,612, 611, 608, 613, 609, 610/2007-DB - Stay Order No: 21017-21023 / 2015 - Dated:- 17-6-2015 - SMT. ARCHANA WADHWA AND SHRI B.S.V.MURTHY, JJ. For The Appellant : Shri B. Bethuraj, Authorised Representative For The Respondent : Shri Pakshi Rajan, Asst. Commissioner(AR) ORDER Per : ARCHANA WADHWA All the stay petitions have been disposed of by a common order as the issue involved in all of them is identical though they arise out of thr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sponsible for clearing all the said computer parts, penalties stand imposed upon them. In the other two impugned orders being order No.10 and Order No.11, the demand of duties stands confirmed against other independent importers on the same charges of under-valuation and penalties stand imposed upon the CHA and its Managing Director separately. The importing firms involved in order No10 and Order No.11 are not before the Tribunal inasmuch as their appeals stand dismissed for default. 3. We find .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

377; 2 lakhs each as a condition of hearing their appeals. By adopting the same criteria, we direct Shri Bethuraj S/o. Bethusamy to deposit an amount of ₹ 1 lakh (Rupees one lakh only) out of the total penalty of ₹ 10 lakhs imposed vide order No.9, to deposit ₹ 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) out of the total penalty of ₹ 2 lakhs imposed vide order No.10 and to further deposit ₹ 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) out of the penalty of ₹ 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version