Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Rocket Engineering Corporation Pvt Ltd Versus Addl. CIT Range-1, Kolhapur

Addition made invoking the provisions of S. 36(1)(iii) r.w.s. 40A(2)(b) - Held that:- In the instant case, there is no question of disallowance of interest on account of interest free advances given to related parties. It is a reverse case wherein the assessee has obtained the loan from related parties by paying exorbitant rate of interest for which the Assessing Officer disallowed the excess interest paid to the related parties by invoking the provisions of section 40A(2)(b) of the I.T. Act. Si .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd since certain additions were made during A.Y. 2006-07 and 2008-09 by the Assessing Officer u/s.14A and nothing has been brought on record as to the outcome of the same including the quantum, therefore, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) upholding the disallowance made u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D for the impugned assessment year. - Decided against assessee.

Disallowance of 10% of the expenses on estimate basis being personal in nature - Held that:- There is no dispute .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

adhoc basis appears to be on the higher side. We therefore direct to restrict such disallowance to 5% of the expenses - Decided partly in favour of assessee. - ITA No.1948/PN/2013 - Dated:- 30-4-2015 - R K Panda, AM And Vikas Awasthy, JM,JJ. For the Appellant : Shri M K Kulkarni For the Respondent : Shri B C Malakar ORDER Per R K Panda, AM. This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 26-08-2013 of the CIT(A), Kolhapur relating to Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. Grounds of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

)(b) are not applicable to the facts of the case the addition confirmed by CIT(A) be deleted. 2) On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the addition made by the A.O. invoking the provisions of S. 36(1)(iii) r.w.s. 40A(2)(b) of the Act, saying that the assessee-company itself offered the same for taxation. The 'offering to tax' was under certain misconception of law. The addition is not sustainable and the same be deleted. 3) O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eady paid which goes to build up the interest free funds. The addition of ₹ 34,10,881/- is unwarranted and it be deleted." 3. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that the issue stands decided against the assessee by the decision of the Tribunal in assessee's own case for the immediately preceding assessment year. We find the Tribunal in assessee's own case vide ITA No.849/PN/2013 order dated 11-08-2014 for A.Y. 2009-10 has decided the issue by observing as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ered the offer of the assessee for addition of ₹ 33,37,059/- for taxation. The assessee after giving in writing to the Assessing Officer regarding the reasons for payment of excess interest @21% to the specified persons has categorically stated that to buy peace of mind he wants to offer the interest paid over and above the bank rate for taxation. Therefore, having offered the same to tax in writing and by giving the individual details for calculating the disallowance the assessee is now a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bleness of such huge interest paid to the Directors. The assessee had given the reasons and thereafter to buy peace of mind had offered the excess interest paid to tax. Therefore, there is no question of any legal misconception which the assessee had foregone by way of concession. It is purely a factual matter. Therefore, we do not find any merit in the grounds raised by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee challenging the disallowance of addition of ₹ 33,37,079/-. 6.2 So far as the decisions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the Directors and related parties @15.60% and offered the balance amount for taxation. Therefore, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the various case decisions relied on by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee are not applicable. 6.3 We further find that the assessee in the grounds has mentioned that it has sufficient interest free funds available which are far in excess of the loans advanced to persons covered u/s.40A(2)(b). In the instant case, there is no question of disallowance .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

40A(2)(b), therefore, the CIT(A) in our opinion was fully justified in upholding the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly dismissed." 4. Facts being similar, therefore, following the decision of the Tribunal the above grounds by the assessee are dismissed. 5. Ground of appeal No.4 by the assessee reads as under: "4) On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. CIT(A) 1962. There is no finding to the effect that any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

med the same as exempt u/s.10(34) of the I.T. Act. No expenditure has been debited for earning this income before claiming the exemption. On being questioned by the AO it was submitted that no expenditure has been incurred for earning this income. Following the order for the preceding assessment year the AO disallowed an amount of ₹ 93,288/- u/s.14A r.w. Rule 8D of the I.T .Act. 7. In appeal the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the action of the AO. While doing so, he observed that no income is earned wit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to earning of exempt income. 8. Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A) the assessee is in appeal before us. 9. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides. We find an identical issue had come up before the Tribunal in assessee's own case for the A.Y. 2009-10. The Tribunal vide ITA No.849/PN/2013 order dated 11-08-2014 has dismissed the grounds raised by the assessee by observing as under: "10. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xempt u/s 10(34) of the I. T. Act. However, the expenditure incurred regarding the same is negligible and cannot be correctly ascertained". 10.1 We further find similar disallowances were made in the assessment orders passed for A.Yrs. 2006-07 and 2008-09 by the Assessing Officer and nothing was brought to our notice as to the outcome of such disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. The relevant observations of the Assessing Officer at para 4.2 and 4.3 of the assessment order read as und .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rder passed for A. Y, 2006-07 and 2008-09 by the AOs on 05/12/2008 and 23/12/2010. Please state as to why identical view should not be taken for disallowance of interest on payments s towards share application money and also disallowance of proportionate expenses for exempted income (i.e. Dividend)". 4.3 In response to the above, the assessee company , vide submission dt. 12/09/2011, in Sr. No. 11, the assessee company replied as under: "11. Regarding the disallowance of interest on sh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.e. dividend) and therefore, I request your honour not to disallow any expenses in this regard." 10.2 Since the assessee itself had admitted that it has incurred certain expenses although the same is negligible which cannot be correctly ascertained and since certain additions were made during A.Y. 2006-07 and 2008-09 by the Assessing Officer u/s.14A and nothing has been brought on record as to the outcome of the same including the quantum, therefore, we do not find any infirmity in the orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essment year and in absence of any contrary material brought to our notice against the order of the Tribunal, we find no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A). Accordingly, the same is upheld and the ground raised by the assessee is dismissed. 11. Ground of appeal No.5 by the assessee reads as under : "5) On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the ad-hoc disallowance of ₹ 1,32,400/- made by the A. 0. The ad-hoc disallowance .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. No telephone call register was maintained to ensure that the entire expenses under this head were incurred for the purpose of business. The AO, therefore, disallowed 10% of the expenses on estimate basis being personal in nature and accordingly made addition of ₹ 1,32,400/- to the total income of the assessee. In appeal the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the action of the AO. 13. Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A) the assessee is in appeal before us. 14. After hearing both the sides, we find an i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: Wrong quote of GSTIN no of buyer in GSTR-1

Forum: Getting upload error message.Cannot upload json file for GSTR1 even after using offline tool V 1.2..

Forum: Issue of Payment Voucher

Forum: filing of unaudited financial accounts

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: need of extention of agm in case of non filing

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version