2015 (7) TMI 890

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Respondent : Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly i/b Ms. Suchitra Kamble ORDER P. C.: We have heard Mr. Desai, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the AppellantCentral Railway and Mr. Jetly, the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue. 2. We have perused the order passed by the Tribunal on the application for condonation of delay. In the given facts and circumstances, we do not find the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ning to the service that the Railway offers to the travelling public. In these circumstances, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal erred in refusing to condone the delay. 3. We, therefore, admit this Appeal on the substantial question of law which reads thus: "Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in refusing to condone the delay of eight mo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X