1998 (8) TMI 595

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Maharashtra). answered in the negative the following question referred to it under the provisions of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the supply of printed material to Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board by the applicant was a sale and not a works contract ? 2. The judgment of the Maharashtra Sale .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he property of the Board; while the property in these goods passed to the Board, this was, in the very nature of things, only incidental or ancillary to the contract of printing. The High Court laid stress on this Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Anandam Viswanathan [1989] 73 STC 1 where the printing and supply of question papers to a university was involved. This Court held that tho .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X