Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Granules India Limited Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2 (3) , HYDERABAD

2015 (8) TMI 6 - ITAT HYDERABAD

TP adjustments - selection of tested party in determination of Arm’s Length Price (ALP) - Held that:- Profitability of the selected Comparable companies in domestic market may vary with the profit margins available abroad, particularly in the USA market. DRP also rejected the method solely on the reason that AE was not selected as tested party. Therefore, keeping in mind the submissions made by the Ld. Counsel, the issue of selection of method of resale price method or of TNMM or any other metho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-5-2015 - SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, JJ. For The Assessee : Shri J.J. Varun, AR For The Revenue : Smt. K. Kamakshi, CIT-DR ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, A.M. : This appeal by Assessee is directed against the Order of the Assessing Officer (AO) passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA(3) consequent to the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) u/s. 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). 2. Briefly stated, assessee M/s. Granules India Limited is engaged in the business of manufac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

djustments : i. Transfer pricing adjustment u/s.92CA Rs. 8,86,12,580 ii. Belated payment of Provident Fund Rs. 1,81,191 iii. Belated payment of Employees State Insurance Rs. 4,58,162 iv Disallowance of GDR expenses u/s.35D Rs. 17,60,140 v. Disallowance of deduction u/s.10B Rs. 3,33,94,883 4. The assessee raised various objections before the DRP and the DRP considered the objections and passed the order dt. 27-11-2013, whereby the addition under TP adjustment was confirmed and on the other additi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on with AE. 2. The TPO erred in selection of the tested party for determination of ALP. 3. The TPO erred in rejecting Resale Price Method (RPM) which was selected by the assessee as the most appropriate method to determine arm's length price for transactions entered with its AE. 4. The DRP in para 6.2 of their order erred in rejecting the submissions made with respect to grounds 1, 2 & 3 above, which consequently led to no relief being granted by the Assessing Officer in Final assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cting a fresh search to identify suitable comparables for comparison under TNMM. 6. The DRP in paras 7.2, 7.3 & 7.4 of their order erred in rejecting the submissions made with respect to ground 5 above, which consequently led to no relief being granted by the Assessing Officer in Final Assessment order u/s. 143(3) dated 31.01.2014. 7. Without prejudice to Ground.5, the TPO erred in applying the following filters in selecting comparable to determine ALP under TNMM a. Turnover Filter - this fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Assessing Officer erred in initiating penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) at the time of finalization of order of Assessment. 10. For the above and / or any other additional grounds that may be submitted at the time of hearing of the appeal, the appellant prays before the Hon'ble Tribunal that the above addition be deleted and necessary order be passed". 5. The assessee has raised 10 grounds in its appeal. Ground No. 1 and 10 are general in nature. Hence, does not require any adjudica .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of finished goods Received Granules USA Inc. 83,06,28,503 RPM 2. Purchase of raw materials Paid Hubei Granules Biocause Pharmaceu ticals Co. Ltd., China 20,76,29,307 CUP 3. Interest received on loan Received Granules USA Inc. 4,18,316 CUP 1,03,86,76,126 7. In the T.P. study assessee had furnished profitability analysis in respect of domestic sales and sales to AE and non-AE under export segment for FY. 2008-09. Assessee has allocated direct and indirect expenses to these segments in proportion .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the website and six comparables were picked from the business of marketing and distribution using the multiple year data. Assessee arrived at weighted average gross profit margin of these companies computed at ranges from 3.07% to 29.23%. The gross profit margin of AE was worked out to 5.13% and concluded that international transaction with the AE were at arm s length. 8. The TPO held that transfer pricing study of the assessee by making the AE as tested party was defective and rejected the s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nal Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate method for analyzing the sale transactions. This TP study was rejected by the TPO. The TPO had used only the current year data on Prowess and Capitaline Plus databases for searching the comparables and selected 8 comparables, the arithmetic mean PLI (OP/OC) of which comes to 21.01% as against the PLI of the taxpayer at 9.35% which is outside the arm's length range of [x/-] 5%. Therefore, the TPO made adjustment u/s. 92CA(3) of ₹ 8,86 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

quirements of the AE. In the TP study, the tested party was the associated enterprise in USA. The assessee exported the finished goods to AE in USA for a sum of ₹ 83.06 Crores and for the TP study purpose, the entity in USA was selected and the taxpayer submitted before the AO and DRP that it had the least complex transactions and ALP can be determined accurately by adopting the RPM and selected 6 comparables from the business of marketing and distribution and concluded that the internatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

venue over 60% and turnover filter between ₹ 190 Crore to ₹ 440 Crores and companies having related party transactions less than 25% and selectged 2 companies (Nueland Labs and Vinathi Organics) as comparables. The TPO found the search process conducted by the assessee defective and carried out an independent analysis by applying TNMM as the MAM for analyzing the sale transactions by using Powess and Capitaline plus databases. The final filters applied by the TPO are as under: i. Com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he company does not fall within 12 month period i.e., 1-4-08 to 31-3-2009 after rejected; vi. Companies that are functionally different from that of taxpayer, after giving valid reasons, were excluded; 13. With regard to TNMM method, to determine the ALP for transaction entered by assessee with its AE, it was submitted before Hon'ble DRP that the TPO was not justified in rejecting the comparables selected by the assessee on the ground viz (1) turnover filter applied by assessee is not approp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee adopted the sales range of ₹ 190 Crores to ₹ 440 Crore whereas the TPO adopted ₹ 250 Crores to ₹ 380 Crores. Since the assessee's turnover is ₹ 315.93 Crores and the assessee had not given any reasons as to why it had adopted such wide range of turnover, the TPO's selection of companies which have similar scale of operation is nearer to the turnover of the assessee and more accurate. Therefore, the turnover filter applied by the TPO was held to be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

were functionally dissimilar had been considered. The panel noted that the TPO had given the profile of the comparables selected and also noted that the companies Natco Pharma Ltd., Venus Remedies Ltd., Hitkal Ltd., had been held to be functionally similar to the assessee-company in the AY. 2008-09 and the DRP had endorsed/considered the view of the TPO. Accordingly, the panel upheld the selection of these three companies as comparables. Regarding Indoco Remedies Ltd., the TPO had noted at para .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

with the order of DRP, the assessee had come up with the present appeal. 17. It was submitted before us by the Ld. AR that the issue may be restored to the file of AO for fresh determination of ALP by following the RPM, since, for earlier years, it was held by this Hon'ble Tribunal that RPM is the most appropriate method for determining the ALP and the issue was restored to the file of AO. Ld CIT-DR had no serious objection for remitting the matter back to the file of AO following the order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version