Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Circle-3 (1) , New Delhi Versus Cheviot International ltd.

Disallowance u/s 14A - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Nothing has been brought on record by the AO to hold why the suo moto disallowance made by the assessee u/s 14A on facts could not be accepted. On consideration thereof it is seen that in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case where the AO has not recorded his finding as to why he was not satisfied by the correctness of assessee’s claim of expenditure. No distinguishing facts and circumstances has been pointed out by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the Act, the term “salary” includes any, fees, commission, perquisites or profit in lieu salary, All the sums are taxable under the head “salary” only. These two directors, while filing the return of income, declared not only the salary but commission also as part of income under the head “salary” The same are assessed as such. Therefore, it is incorrect to hold that bonus or commission shall not form part of salary or remuneration. In accordance with the provisions of section 36(1)(ii) any su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h sum would have been paid to the employees as profit or dividend. Thus, the exception provided in section 36(1)(ii) do not apply. In such circumstances the amount payable as commission are allowable u/s 36(1)(ii) of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee. - I.T.A . No.-4776/Del/2012 - Dated:- 19-8-2015 - SMT DIVA SINGH AND SH. T. S. KAPOOR, JJ. For The Appellant : Smt. Parwinder Kaur, Sr. DR For The Respondent : Sh. R. K. Kapoor, CA ORDER PER DIVA SINGH, JM By the present appeal the Revenue a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reserving the right to amend, modify, after, add or forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this appeal. 2. The relevant facts of the case are that the assessee in the year under consideration declared an income of ₹ 3,80,63,020/- which was processed u/s 143(1) and subsequently after issuance of notice etc u/s 143(2) and 142(1) etc. it was subjected to scrutiny assessment. The record shows that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufactu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in appeal before the Tribunal. 4. Ld. Sr. DR relies upon the assessment order. The Ld. AR assessee on the other hand inviting attention to paras 4 to 4.4 of the assessment order submitted that the disallowance has been made in a mechanical manner and contrary to the mandate of the law which necessitates that the AO is duty-bound to record a satisfaction as to how the disallowance made by the assessee is considered to be not proper. Referring to page 4 of the impugned order, it was submitted that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e CIT(A) it was submitted also recorded the finding that nothing has been brought on record by the AO to hold why the suo moto disallowance made by the assessee of ₹ 97,604/- u/s 14A on facts could not be accepted. Accordingly it was his submission that relying upon the proposition of law as laid down by the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs CIT [2012] 347 ITR 272 (Del.) and followed by another judgements dated 25.11.2014 in the case of CIT vs Taikisha Engi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ench in order dated 22.01.2015 in ITA No.2623/Del/2013. The same it was requested may be followed. 4.1. The Ld. Sr. DR relied upon the assessment order. Considering the afore-said order of the Co-ordinate Bench stated to be an identical facts and circumstances, no distinguishing facts or circumstances was cited before the Bench in order to canvass a contrary view. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. On consideration thereof it is seen that in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o the commission of ₹ 11,00,000/- paid to Mrs. Malati Kanoria, Managing Director u/s 36(1)(ii). Considering the fact that the assessee company had declared a profit of ₹ 3,28,19,588/- the AO concluded that the amount paid as a commission could have been paid as a profit or dividend. Accordingly the assessee was asked to show why disallowance of the said amount not be made. The assessee placed reliance upon the order of the ITAT in 2003-04 assessment year. However not convinced with t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat infact the order of the ITAT in 2003-04 assessment years, was upheld by the Hon ble High Court also. In order to establish that in 2008-09 assessment year and 2007-08 assessment year, there was no variation in the view taken, attention was invited to order dated 22.01.2015 in ITA No.- 2623/Del/2013 (Assessment year 2008-09) where the issue was decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in following manner:- 4. Ground No. 2 relates to addition of ₹ 13 lakhs being commission paid to Mrs. Malati Ka .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e us take a different opinion. On the contrary the appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the Tribunal, stands dismissed by an order of the Hon ble High Court dated 18th February 2011 in ITA No.776/2010. In such a scenario, we find no infirmity in the order impugned. So we dismiss this ground of appeal of revenue. 8.1. Similarly it was submitted that the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 20.07.2010 in ITA No.-2349/Del/2010 for 2007-08 assessment year, decided the issue in the followin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on on fact or law was brought to the notice of the Bench. 10. We have heard the rival issues and perused the material available on record. The record shows that disallowance as per past practice was made by the AO. The reply of the assessee before the AO it is seen citing order of the ITAT on identical issue in 2003-04 Assessment Year relying upon the statutory provisions was not accepted. In appeal the CIT(A) summed up the facts in the following manner:- 5.1 During the appellate proceedings, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ear 2002-03 wherein for the first time disallowance on the similar allegations and for the same reasons was made by the AD. The issue travelled up to the Hon ble ITAT, New Delhi, and the same was decided in favour of the assessee in ITA No. 3863/DEU2007 by holding that the commission has been paid in terms of conditions of employment. Therefore, relief to the assessee may be allowed because the reasoning given in the assessment order as well as the basis of disallowance are identical to the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

commission paid to Mrs. Malati Kanoria, director of ₹ 7,72,712/- u/s section 36(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The relevant extract of the aforesaid order of the Hon ble ITAT is reproduce below for reference:- 8. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record. The commission is disallowed on the following reasons: - i. the assessee failed to explain the nature of services rendered for payment of commission; and ii. th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssion to these two directors. The remuneration payable was held as allowable business expenses and in respect of which there is no dispute. Therefore, there is no dispute regarding rendering of the services, by these two directors. What is the remuneration payable for such services was decided by the board of directors and, hence, in terms of resolution, these two directors were entitled to receive remuneration. Accordingly, it cannot be said that there is not evidence regarding the nature of se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssed as such. Therefore, it is incorrect to hold that bonus or commission shall not form part of salary or remuneration. In accordance with the provisions of section 36(1)(ii) any sum paid to an employee as bonus or commission for services rendered where such sum would, not have been payable to him as profit or dividend if it had not been paid as bonus or commission is allowable. The sum paid to the directors is as an employee of the company. The bonus or commission payable for the services rend .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Forum: 3B mistake

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Article: RCM – Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version