Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Income Tax-V Versus Thermax Ltd.

2015 (9) TMI 78 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Condonation of delay of 1203 days - affidavit in support of the notice of motion states that the reason for the delay was the change in the panel of advocates representing the revenue with effect from June 2008 - Held that:- The affidavit in support .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onths from the date of the dismissal of the appeal and removal of the advocate. It does not state the date on which the deponent of the affidavit came to know of the order of this Court dated 17 April 2007 dismissing it's appeal. The aforesaid date w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be in touch with their counsel appearing in respect of the appeal and the result of their attempts at contacting the advocate.

The explanation offered for the delay is without any basis particularly because the date of coming to know of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

peal (ST) No. 725 of 2006 - Dated:- 21-8-2015 - M. S. Sanklecha And G. S. Kulkarni, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv I/b Shyam Walve For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv M Shah, Adv ORDER P. C. This notice of motion has been taken out to rest .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the notice of motion states that the reason for the delay was the change in the panel of advocates representing the revenue with effect from June 2008. Consequently, the deponent of the affidavit was not informed that the appeal was dismissed for non .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on 17 April 2007 while the advocate representing the revenue in this case was removed from the panel in June 2008. Thus there is no explanation for the period of more than 1 Year and 2 Months from the date of the dismissal of the appeal and removal o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version