2003 (8) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... m of 'Padakanika' for organising any religious function is liable to charge under the Service Tax Act, 1944 (sic) [Finance Act, 1994], is an issue to be considered herein. 2. The Department has demanded the Service Tax, charged interest and imposed penalty on the ground that the hall premises owned by the Krishnapur Mutt is a Mandap under Section 65(22) of the Service Tax Act, 1944 (sic) (F .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hall for any official, social or business functions but only giving for religious functions and is also not charging any rent, but sometimes, the followers are giving the money as donation or 'Padakanika' to the Pontiff of the Mutt and hence, the activity undertaken is not a taxable activity and do not attract service tax. 5. According to the Department, in almost all the cases, a uniform .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nising mainly religious functions such as marriages and Brahmopadeshas. It is very difficult to conceive the idea put forth by the Revenue that these functions couldn't be considered as religious functions but to be qualified as social functions. It is well settled position from the time immemorial that, marriage is sacred and sacrament as recognised under Hindu law. It is not a social contract as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X