New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 498 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

2015 (9) TMI 498 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT - TMI - Trading addition - assessee failed to justify the adoption of sale price at less than opening stock price with documentary evidence - ITAT restricted the addition to ₹ 2,00,000/- as against ₹ 41,24,000/- made by AO - Held that:- The Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹ 41,24,000/- on the ground that the assessee failed to justify the adoption of sale price at less than opening stock price with documentary evidence. Fur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

price. The Tribunal while partly allowing the appeal of the assessee had sustained the addition of ₹ 2,00,000/- in the trading account. A perusal of para 8 of the order of the Tribunal shows that no legally justified reasons have been recorded for arriving at the said conclusion.

In view of the above, the matter requires to be remanded. The matter is remitted to the Tribunal to decide the same afresh on merits in accordance with law. - Decided in favour of revenue for statistic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bunal, Chandigarh Bench A , Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ) in ITA No. 556/CHD/2013 for the assessment year 2009-10, claiming the following substantial questions of law:- I. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT was right in law and in the facts of this case to set-aside the order of the CIT(A) and directing the A.O. to make an addition of ₹ 2,00,000/- in trading account deleting the addition made by the A.O. by ignoring the fact that the A.O. made an addition of ₹ 41,24 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal as narrated therein are that the assessee filed his return of income on 29.9.2008 for the assessment year 2009-10 declaring an income of ₹ 3,79,160/-. The assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer vide order dated 29.12.2011 (Annexure A-1) at an income of ₹ 45,03,160/-. The Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹ 41,24,000/- on account of differences in opening stock price and sale price. Feeling aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

revenue. The assessee also filed cross-objections challenging the addition of ₹ 2,00,000/- sustained by the Tribunal. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue submitted that the Tribunal while partly accepting the appeal of the assessee had directed that in their opinion the estimated addition of ₹ 2,00,000/- was required to be made without giving any basis for the same as against the addition of ₹ 41,24,000/- made by the Assessing Of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version